Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Writing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dysart board reviews where cursive is taught; district says cursive is mapped in grades 2–3 but not enforced after third grade
Summary
District curriculum staff reviewed where cursive handwriting is taught in Dysart Unified School District pacing guides and how it aligns with state essential standards.
District curriculum staff reviewed the Dysart Unified School District’s current approach to handwriting and cursive instruction during a board information item, showing where cursive appears in local pacing guides and in state essential standards.
The presenter said the Arizona ELA third‑grade standards include 49 state standards, 15 of which the state identifies as “essential” for mastery. Writing appears under a handwriting standard (described in materials as “Demonstrate and apply handwriting skills”), with the state language noted as “read and write cursive letters, uppercase and lowercase” and “transcribe ideas legibly in cursive.” The district’s HMH pacing guide maps explicit handwriting instruction (letter formation practice, modeling and line‑paper practice), and staff showed examples of student work and classroom notes written in cursive.
When board members questioned timing and continuity, staff clarified Dysart begins explicit cursive instruction in second grade and reloops the instruction in third grade because the state defines it as a third‑grade standard. “We start in second grade and then we reloop in third grade,” the presenter said, and added that the district does not currently require students to continue producing work in cursive beyond those grades.
A board member referenced a State Board of Education item stating Arizona standards require cursive through fifth grade; staff replied Dysart has not mapped cursive through fifth grade but said they could add it if the board wished. Staff also noted practical constraints: teachers must cover a broad set of essential standards and may prioritize tested standards and foundational literacy goals when time is limited.
Board discussion touched on instructional practice and cognitive benefits: one board member urged broader incorporation of handwriting across grades for motor and cognitive advantages and asked the district to explore mapping cursive further into the K–8 sequence.
Staff offered to return with options for incorporating cursive beyond third grade and acknowledged that curricular mapping changes would require alignment with existing ELA priorities and teacher capacity.
This was an informational presentation; no formal vote was taken.
