Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Painted Signage Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Owner seeks painted-sign master plan at 67 Gansevoort; proximity to neighboring billboard triggers review
Summary
Crew (building owner) asked the committee to approve a painted-sign master plan for a mural-style sign at 67 Gansevoort Street. The application proceeded to committee because a leased billboard on a nearby building is within 100 feet, requiring public review rather than staff-level approval.
Get email alerts on the Painted Signage Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representatives for Crew, the owner of 67 Gansevoort Street, presented an application for a painted wall sign (a branded painted mural) on the side of their building. The owner’s team said they purchased the building in 2020 and have invested in façade repairs and a flagship store at the ground floor. Their consultant said they intended to paint a sign advertising their own brand and would not lease the wall to third parties.
The application was elevated to the public committee because a nearby billboard (a Maui Jim advertisement) sits roughly 60–70 feet from the proposed sign location; that proximity triggers a higher level of review under staff rules. Presenters showed a map and elevations indicating the proposed sign would cover about 14% of the visible wall area, below the staff guideline of 20% for painted signs in the neighborhood.
Committee members asked about prior approvals, potential ghost signage under existing finishes, and whether the proposed sign would cover any historic paint. The applicant said no historic ghost signage would be covered. No public commenters raised objections during this presentation. The applicant noted that, if installed, the painted artwork shown would be the first of the building’s master-plan signs and that any future changes would proceed through staff-level review within the approved master-plan scope.
No formal vote or written decision was recorded in the transcript excerpt; committee members asked clarifying questions about setbacks, percent of wall coverage, and staff-level review processes.

