Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss removing modern graffiti from historic courthouse windows
Summary
Commissioners and county staff discussed whether to remove recent graffiti carved into a historic courthouse window, balancing restoration standards, historic preservation and potential to encourage further vandalism.
Commissioners discussed restoration work on a historic courthouse window and whether to remove modern graffiti carved into the glass.
A county official suggested sanding and “floating out” the modern carved names to restore the window to its original appearance, saying the graffiti dated from recent decades rather than from a historic era and could be removed while preserving the window’s historic character. Another commissioner urged caution, noting that visible names and graffiti can encourage copycat vandalism.
Why it matters: The courthouse is a public historic building; decisions about restoration affect preservation obligations and public perception. Commissioners sought clarity about preservation rules and whether removing post‑historic defacement would comply with restoration standards.
Discussion centered on whether the carved names were part of the window’s historic fabric. One participant said the carved names from the 1990s are “not historic” and could be removed, while another cautioned that visible inscriptions from older eras are a legitimate part of a historic object’s appearance. Commissioners asked staff to gather more information and to identify a restoration approach that would revert the window to its original look while following preservation standards.
Ending: Commissioners asked staff to obtain more information and to plan a restoration approach that preserves the window’s historic integrity while addressing modern defacement. No formal action was taken at the Feb. 10 meeting.
