Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Density topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee adopts oral amendment to change 'shall' to 'may' in light-touch density bill after concerns from municipalities

2524746 · March 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 7113, a permissive bill allowing municipalities to adopt ‘light touch’ density plans, was amended in committee to replace a mandatory 'shall' with 'may' after lawmakers raised concerns about imposing new requirements on small towns.

The committee considered House Bill 7113, which creates a framework for municipal “light touch” density plans that make it easier to authorize duplexes, triplexes, and other low‑rise multifamily housing where water and sewer are available. Representative Corpus questioned whether the bill’s title—using the word “permitting”—is misleading because the draft is permissive, not mandatory.

Corpus asked specifically about lines 29–32 of the draft, which originally read that a single‑family zone “shall be considered administratively without discretionary review or hearing.” Corpus said the wording reads like a mandate and raised concerns about small municipal planning departments being overwhelmed and about whether environmental and traffic supports have been considered. She also asked why the bill singles out water and sewer availability but not other infrastructure considerations.

The sponsor clarified that the bill allows municipalities to adopt objective zoning standards and that adoption would be optional; after debate, a member moved an oral amendment striking the word “shall” and replacing it with “may” in line 30. The motion to adopt the oral amendment was moved and seconded and approved by voice vote. The bill as amended was then moved JF to the floor on a roll‑call vote.

Representative Corpus expressed broader concern about multiple overlapping housing bills creating confusing, overlapping frameworks for municipalities. The sponsor responded that because this bill is optional, towns can opt in only if they want to, and that the proposals can operate alongside other bills by design.

The committee’s adopted amendment makes the measure explicitly permissive, removing the clause that committee members said could have functioned as a mandate. The bill now proceeds to the floor with the oral amendment adopted.