Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Brownfield Liability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council receives and files report on Para Vista project after members press staff on methane, insurance and city liability
Summary
Councilmembers asked for clearer assurances about liability and insurance for the Para Vista development and voted to receive and file the staff report; staff said mitigation measures were imposed and the Department of Building and Safety had approved the project as safe but acknowledged risk if a private developer later lacks coverage.
The Los Angeles City Council received and filed a staff report on the Para Vista development after extended questioning about methane migration, insurance coverage and whether the city could be held liable in future lawsuits.
Councilmember Holden pressed staff for specifics about the developer's insurance, whether coverage could lapse, and what protections the city would have if the developer went out of business after project build-out. "What if the developer goes out of business? What if the insurance lapses? The only other deep pocket is the city of Los Angeles," Holden said, noting concern for potential future litigation.
An assistant city attorney explained that the agreements associated with the project, including the bond financing and infrastructure funding agreements, contain indemnification clauses and requirements for pollution-liability policies before the city disburses infrastructure funds. Staff also said the city had been named on an existing liability policy and that an extensive study, conducted under the Chief Legislative Analyst's supervision, supported the conclusion that the mitigation measures required made the site safe for residential occupancy. "It's the opinion of the city staff that it is safe to live and construct buildings, provided the mitigation measures described in that report were imposed," staff said.
The assistant city attorney and councilmembers also warned that indemnities and insurance can be limited if the developer becomes insolvent or bankrupt and that such outcomes can expose the city to claims. Holden said he wanted the item continued until incoming CRA administration staff could be consulted, and the council granted a one-day continuance earlier in the meeting for related items; the recorded action on the Para Vista item was to receive and file the report.
The motion to receive and file was adopted by roll call (recorded in the council minutes as a 13-aye vote). Councilmembers recorded their concern on the public record and asked staff to ensure long-term protections and to clarify where the city's liability would reside if private warranties or insurance failed in the future.
