Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecom Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council approves code changes tightening review of wireless facilities near homes and schools
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council voted to adopt zoning-code language requiring discretionary review for wireless telecommunications facilities sited next to residential zones and schools, while preserving an exemption path for industrial/commercial sites that meet design guidelines.
The Los Angeles City Council on July 17 approved changes to the municipal code to formalize standards and review procedures for wireless telecommunications facilities, with a focus on protecting residential neighborhoods and schools.
The measure requires conditional-use review when a wireless installation would be in an industrial zone adjacent to a residential or agricultural zone, and preserves targeted exemptions for industrial or commercial locations that meet specified aesthetic and siting guidelines. Planning staff told the council that if an industrial or commercial facility is adjacent to housing or a school it would be subject to discretionary review.
Planning Department staff Frank Eberhard, who led the presentation, said the code amendment ties approvals to general-plan conformance and clarifies that an industrial exemption does not apply when a facility is adjacent to residential zoning or agricultural zoning. "If they cannot make that finding, they cannot approve the project," Eberhard said during committee discussion. He also told members that schools would generally require approval if the installation is by a private telecommunications company rather than a school use.
Councilmembers pressed staff on the definition of "adjacent," and staff replied that adjacency includes across-the-street and common boundary lines. Councilmember Misakowski and others emphasized that the change codifies requirements that had been applied inconsistently in the past and said the new language aims to "even the playing field" so all neighborhoods receive similar aesthetic treatment and noticed hearings.
Several members said the code is not final and will be refined. Councilmember Brunson said he planned to bring a follow-up motion to require higher aesthetic standards for all facilities, industrial or not. The council approved the item by recorded vote, with the clerk announcing "13 ayes."
Councilmember Zine, who called the item special, thanked colleagues for the discussion and acknowledged further amendments could be expected as the city implements the new language.
The code change instructs planning staff to implement the conditional-use procedure for installations that are adjacent to residential uses and clarifies review requirements for mixed-use or rezoned parcels; it does not itself create site-specific approvals.
