Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Secession Lafco Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council approves response to LAFCO on harbor-area secession proposal
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council voted to transmit the city's technical financial response to LAFCO regarding proposed secession of harbor-area communities, while urging county commission review of remaining issues before any future votes.
The Los Angeles City Council voted Wednesday to approve and forward the city's financial response to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) on a proposal for harbor-area secession.
The action, moved in the course of debate on item 5, was approved by a roll call showing 13 ayes. Councilmember Janice Hahn, who led discussion on the item, said the 600-page report is the city's technical reply to LAFCO's initial fiscal analysis and to the applicants' reorganization proposal and recommended it be sent to LAFCO while outstanding questions are addressed.
The report compiles technical comments from city departments, the Chief Administrative Office (CAO) and the City Attorney and aims to identify unresolved issues LAFCO should consider in a comprehensive fiscal analysis. Hahn told colleagues the report raises questions about how employees and existing city debt would be divided and whether a newly formed city could sustain its services and fiscal obligations.
"There are still so many issues like how do we divide employees? How do we divide the debt? Is this new city going to be able to stand on their own?" Hahn said. She said she recommended sending the report to LAFCO but urged that LAFCO be pressed to address those open matters so voters will have the information they need.
Councilmember Gloria Molina said the report is neutral on the question of secession and is intended to focus on the financial side so voters will have the facts about fiscal impacts. Several other council members argued the process should proceed so residents can decide in a vote if they want to secede, while noting the need to ensure voters receive complete information.
The council's approval sends the city's response to LAFCO for its comprehensive fiscal analysis. The report and the council's remarks note the possibility of a November 2002 ballot for related measures, and councilmembers repeatedly urged LAFCO and state and local agencies to resolve outstanding legal and fiscal questions before any ballot measure is finalized.
Votes and procedural detail: the clerk recorded the vote as 13 ayes on the motion to forward the report to LAFCO. The transcript does not list a formal mover or seconder for the motion.
Context: Councilmembers voiced concerns about port-related impacts and the port's status as a proprietary entity; comments indicated that some harbor residents feel disconnected from city government and are pursuing greater local control. The council and city staff repeatedly framed the action as a technical step in LAFCO's review rather than an endorsement for or against secession.
