Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Home Business topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County counsel to submit testimony opposing aspects of no-impact home-based business bill that would pre-empt local zoning
Summary
Sedgwick County staff recommended submitting testimony on a state bill that would broaden home-based business rights in unincorporated areas; staff warned the bill could limit local zoning authority and leave improvement districts vulnerable unless covenants exist.
Sedgwick County staff and the county counselor discussed pending state legislation aimed at "no-impact" home-based businesses and recommended submitting testimony to clarify local concerns.
Justin Weidner, county counselor, explained the bill's scope and limits. He said the draft would allow homeowners to run businesses from their homes unless specifically prohibited; the bill lists a few exceptions such as selling liquor, illegal drugs and operating certain types of sober-living houses. "The bill says they should not sell liquor, or illegal drugs," Justin said, noting the bill's language could be tightened (he suggested using the term "liquor" rather than "alcohol").
Why it matters: Planning staff and county counsel flagged that the bill could pre-empt some local zoning rules in unincorporated areas, potentially affecting improvement districts and typical county land-use controls. Justin noted the bill was altered to preserve homeowners association covenants, so restrictive covenants in an HOA would still apply, but improvement districts in unincorporated areas without covenants could be treated like any other unincorporated property.
Staff recommendation: Planning staff and counsel recommended submitting testimony outlining the county's concerns and asking for clarifying amendments that preserve local zoning authority where appropriate. Commissioners signaled support for submitting a letter that also acknowledges property-rights principles while urging protections for local planning authority.
Ending: Staff said they would add a brief acknowledgement of property rights in the draft letter and forward the testimony to legislative contacts ahead of the hearing.
