Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Claims Smoke Damage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Topanga residents report delays and denials; FAIR Plan and callers dispute smoke‑damage coverage
Summary
Residents at a Topanga FAIR Plan workshop said smoke remediation claims have been delayed or denied; the FAIR Plan representative described typical claim timelines and the appeal process, while a caller said a class action is challenging denials for smoke cleanup.
Get email alerts on the Claims Smoke Damage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Topanga residents at a Saturday FAIR Plan workshop reported long delays in claim responses, disputed denials for smoke remediation and raised health concerns about ash that may contain lead or asbestos.
Peter Irwin, broker liaison for the California FAIR Plan, said claimants receive an acknowledgement when a claim is filed online or by phone and that adjusters and a team are available to handle high‑priority cases. He said policyholders should expect “some progress” within roughly three to five days for urgent claims and that FAIR Plan staff could push long‑delayed claims to the front of the queue when residents meet with staff one‑on‑one.
Several residents said they had waited weeks without a clear acceptance or denial. One attendee said remediation quotes they had received ranged from $17,000 to $50,000. Irwin said the FAIR Plan’s policy language requires “physical damage” from smoke in order to trigger coverage for remediation, and he said the plan evaluates whether smoke has caused physical, demonstrable harm such as discoloration.
A caller identified as Adam said he and others have a different reading of policy language and told the meeting there is an active class action suit alleging the FAIR Plan is improperly refusing to pay for smoke remediation. “The box is checked that says that smoke damage is ... part of the coverage,” Adam said. “We have a very smoky, unlivable house right now that needs to be cleaned.” Irwin acknowledged disputes over interpretation and recommended individual appeals where denials have occurred.
Irwin said the FAIR Plan’s website lists the formal claim and appeals procedures and that claimants should work with their broker to appeal denials. He also said the FAIR Plan pays fair rental value — living expenses for mandatory evacuations — from the date of evacuation through the date residents are permitted to return; one attendee noted a reimbursement example of roughly $3,500 for a nine‑day displacement.
Why this matters: Smoke remediation affects habitability, health and the cost of recovery for many homeowners in fire‑impacted neighborhoods. Disputes over whether smoke constitutes “physical damage” determine whether insurers pay for expensive cleanup and replacement of contaminated materials.
Practical notes from the meeting: file claims at www.cfpnet.com; include current contact information; confirm mortgagee and billing details 60 days before renewal to avoid administrative cancellations; and request an adjuster or appeals information through the FAIR Plan claims page if you believe a denial is incorrect.
Residents who said they were offered little response were advised to take part in upcoming Department of Insurance workshops for one‑on‑one help with claims and appeals.

