Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Building Repair topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BAR approves staircase and retaining-wall repairs but tables front-window decision at 435 N. Bradley St.
Summary
Board approved replacement of the failing front staircase and retaining wall at 435 North Bradley Street for safety reasons, and tabled a request to replace the front windows pending further guidance from the Department of Historic Resources.
The Winchester Board of Architectural Review on March 6 approved reconstruction of a deteriorating front staircase and retaining wall at 435 North Bradley Street and tabled a related request to replace the front windows until the board can obtain additional guidance from the Department of Historic Resources.
Homeowner Paul Zirconi described structural deterioration of the lower staircase and retaining wall, saying parts of the stair assembly had collapsed during a recent cold spell and the wall shows long-standing cracks. Zirconi said contractors recommended removing damaged material down to the cinder block, reinforcing the wall and applying a stucco or concrete finish to match the house—s existing appearance. The contractor also proposed installing drainage measures such as French drains; the applicant said the intention is to reuse the existing railing when possible and to match the current visual character, including a bullnose step detail.
Board members agreed the retaining wall and lower stairs presented an immediate safety and maintenance concern and supported allowing the owner to proceed with reconstruction. The board voted to approve the staircase and retaining-wall work as presented and to table the front-window replacement pending additional information from the city staff and the state Department of Historic Resources about acceptable replacement materials on visible elevations.
Staff told the applicant that rebuilding will require standard building permits and that the board could reexamine the window proposal when the applicant provides product samples and additional documentation. The applicant said he has already invested roughly $250,000 into the house and asked that the board allow him to begin the critical exterior safety repairs. The board—s motion approved the structural work and delayed action on windows to permit staff to consult DHR and for the applicant to return with further documentation.
