Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge review of Bay County animal-control practices and seek release of dog labelled "dangerous"
Summary
Multiple speakers during public comment asked Bay County commissioners to review animal-control procedures, seek release of a dog named Nala and change policies on seizures, fees and behavioral evaluations.
Three residents addressed the Bay County Board of County Commissioners during the public comment period on June 3 about animal-control practices and the case of a dog named Nala.
Sylvia Jones of 10305 Thomas Morning told commissioners Nala has been confined "in isolation for 6 months," saying the dog's only apparent offense was protecting the owner from a man who approached too closely and who later was arrested on drug charges. Jones urged the county to review and release Nala, to equip animal-control officers with body cameras, to require legal documentation such as search warrants before seizing animals except in cases of immediate danger, to reform cat-trapping policies, to create a citizen oversight board and to adopt a sliding scale for impound fees.
Janet Renee Purvis, identified as a lifelong Bay County resident, said Nala had been labelled a "dangerous dog" after an incident in which the injured person received three stitches. Purvis said the man's injuries were not severe or disfiguring and that Nala was acting to protect her owner. She described Nala as having a long history of interactions with people and other animals without injurious incidents and said the dangerous-dog designation was unfair.
Douglas Kilpatrick, who identified himself as Nala's owner, said he believes the dog went to the road to protect him after a man ran by in the dark and that the man had a prior arrest for drug charges. Kilpatrick said Nala had been in animal control since January and said prior reports alleging aggressive behavior did not match a sworn, notarized affidavit from a neighbor he presented.
Speakers supplied fee figures cited as part of the county's impound process: $50 for a first impound, $100 for a second, $200 for subsequent impounds and $10 per day boarding. Commenters said those costs create an undue financial burden for households and can lead to euthanasia when owners cannot pay. The speakers urged the commission to review current animal-control policies and procedures in light of Nala's case; the commission did not take action during the meeting but invited speakers to meet with staff after adjournment for follow-up.
