Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meadow council hears safety concerns over semis, trailers on Main Street; agrees to follow up with UDOT
Summary
At its Jan. 20 meeting, the Meadow Town Council heard residents raise public-safety concerns about semi trucks and trailers parked on the state right-of-way at a Main Street intersection and discussed apparent lack of a business license for the property; councilmembers agreed to coordinate with UDOT and examine town records.
Meadow — Residents and councilmembers raised safety concerns at the Meadow Town Council meeting on Jan. 20 about semi trucks, trailers and a dumpster parked near a Main Street intersection that several speakers said reduce sight lines for motorists.
The remarks came during the meeting's public-comment period, when a resident described semi trucks and two trailers pulled far onto the roadway and urged the council and state officials to address the hazard. Council members said the strip where the vehicles are parked is state right-of-way, not town property, and said they would pursue multiple channels to resolve the issue.
The council asked the town clerk to check business-license records and learned the business operating at that location does not have an active Meadow business license. Mayor Bishop said the business owner told town officials at one point “it's none of our business,” and council members said they needed to be careful about the town's legal authority before taking enforcement action.
Why it matters: vehicles and stored equipment obstructing sight lines at intersections can create a public-safety hazard for drivers and pedestrians. Council members repeatedly framed the issue as both a safety concern and a jurisdictional question because the area in question is a state highway right-of-way.
Details from the meeting: council members reported that county or state officials had previously asked a different property owner to move similar equipment, and one councilmember said the county had contacted a property owner about items on the frontage road. The council asked staff to contact UDOT or the state contact they have used previously (Bryce) and to reach out to a named state official, Keith Reinhardt, to request help clearing or regulating the parked equipment.
The town clerk, Monica, confirmed she had pulled business-license records at a council request and found the entity at that location did not have an active Meadow business license. Councilmembers discussed the need to avoid selectively enforcing licensing rules — one member suggested a townwide review of business-license compliance once the council finishes work on a short-term rental ordinance.
Actions and next steps: Councilmembers agreed to follow up with UDOT and to review the town's business-license records. One councilmember volunteered to contact Bryce and report back at a future meeting. No enforcement action was taken during the meeting.
Community impact and unresolved items: the council did not identify the property's street address in the meeting record and did not set a timeline for enforcement. The clerk's records show the business lacks an active license; the council emphasized it will coordinate with UDOT because the parking is on state right-of-way. Councilmembers also said they will examine town ordinances and the parking code to determine whether the observed conditions violate local regulations.
Ending: Council members asked staff to pursue the state contact, review licensing records, and return to the council with findings at a subsequent meeting.
