Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board proposes community meetings on student cell-phone and social-media use; members debate purpose and scope
Summary
USD 383 board members proposed a series of community conversations to share research about adolescent device use and social media. Members debated whether the meetings are educational outreach, a precursor to policy change, or an overreach by the board.
Board members in Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 discussed a proposal to hold community meetings about student cell-phone and social-media use, intended to inform parents about research on adolescent device use and ask for community input.
Board member Katie (first name used in discussion) and colleagues presented a plan for roughly six one-hour meetings at area schools or community sites between spring break and April, plus a short (15-minute) presentation and handout drawing heavily on the research summarized in The Anxious Generation and the state task-force findings. The stated intent is educational: to explain why board members and some educators are concerned about how personal devices and social media affect learning and adolescent development, not to decide a specific policy during those sessions.
Several board members said they supported the outreach but urged clarity about objectives. One board member asked whether the meetings would be an information campaign or a step toward a formal board directive to administration about discipline or policy changes. Board members repeatedly said the sessions should not become a public poll or a forum for policymaking; rather, they said, the goal was to increase awareness and get community buy-in before any policy work.
Other comments emphasized that schools cannot solve device use alone and that parents, businesses and community partners should be included. Members suggested possible supplements such as a community book study, a longer Saturday program at the library with community partners (pediatricians, law enforcement, mental-health providers), or rotating presentations at rotary and civic groups.
Board members also discussed practical constraints: keeping the presentation to 15 minutes, assembling a resource handout, coordinating with building principals, and whether the material should be posted on the district website and shared via school and board social channels. Several members said they wanted to review the draft presentation and letter at the board retreat later in February before public rollout.
Some board members expressed skepticism about the effort: one called the topic a discipline issue and asked whether the board should be spending time on outreach if classroom expectations already require students to put away phones when instructed. Others said evidence about addictive design and adolescent brain development justifies outreach and that state-level conversations and possible future statute make it prudent for the district to engage families now.
Board members agreed to continue developing the materials, with a plan to review a draft at the board retreat and return to the topic; no formal policy or directive was approved at the meeting.
