Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ccap Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bend ECC nearing CCAP update endorsement; members debate prioritization and implementation resources
Summary
Committee staff reported the CCAP update is near finalization after greenhouse-gas modeling and a community survey; members discussed whether to pare the action list (currently expanded to 74 actions) and recommended linking prioritization to upcoming council goals and working-group review.
Get email alerts on the Ccap Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee staff told the Climate and Environment Committee on Jan. 9 that Bend's Community Climate Action Plan update has reached a stage where the committee needs to adopt a proposed action list and consider implementation recommendations, including funding sources and a community partner grant program.
Staff overview and timeline
The staff presentation recapped steps to date: an initial review and refinement of existing CCAP actions, working-group development of new actions, greenhouse-gas modeling and a community survey conducted in October–November. Staff said the modeling and survey results are largely complete and that the committee's next step is to adopt the action list and decide whether to include implementation recommendations in the package to council.
Committee conversation: scope, prioritization and implementation
Members debated whether the updated plan's breadth — staff noted the action list grew from 42 to 74 items across 23 strategies — makes it difficult to prioritize staff time and organizational resources. Several members recommended producing a shorter, prioritized two-year work plan tied to council goals so that staff and supporting departments can align resources.
Rory Isbell cautioned against viewing the plan as a list of simultaneous obligations, saying, "I have never viewed this plan as, like, a list of, actions that, like, must be worked on simultaneously or, like, must be conquered in x timeline. It's it's it's a universe." Isbell argued the plan should remain a living catalog of options while recognizing that prioritization will be needed for implementation.
Other members reiterated capacity concerns and suggested using existing working groups to make an initial pass at trimming or consolidating actions before the committee finalizes a recommended list. Staff advised that significant reworking of the action list would affect the schedule and, if new items require modeling, could require additional technical work.
Implementation recommendations
Staff proposed the CCAP update include two implementation-focused recommendations: (1) a designated funding source for implementing CCAP programs, and (2) creation of a community partner grant program to support community organizations that will help deliver the plan. Staff said both items had been previously raised with council and that reiterating them with the update would strengthen implementation capacity.
Next steps
The committee agreed to continue discussion at the next meeting and to use working groups to review the action list and recommend consolidations or priority items. Staff noted the council's goals workshop is scheduled before the committee's next meeting and that aligning a two-year work plan with council goals would help secure staff support and resources.
Why it matters: Final adoption of the CCAP update and clear implementation direction (including funding) will determine which city and community actions move from planning to execution and shape Bend's greenhouse-gas reduction trajectory.
Speakers
- Cassie (staff) — Climate and Environment Program (overview and procedural guidance). - Rory Isbell — Committee member; staff attorney with a local environmental advocacy organization (argued the plan is a "universe" of actions and that prioritization should not be conflated with removing options). - Mark Buckley — Committee member (commented on coordination with council goal setting and resource alignment). - Neil Bonsgard — Committee member and former chair (noted the role of working groups in advancing actions). - Nick (new member) — Committee member (asked procedural/practical questions about prioritization and resources).
Clarifying details
- Plan scope: 23 strategies and 74 proposed actions (staff presented these numbers during the meeting). - Modeling assumptions: Staff noted the GHG modeling assumed actions were implemented by 2030; members flagged that some actions may be unrealistic in that timeframe and sought clearer short-term priorities. - Updating cadence: Staff characterized the update cadence as approximately every 3–5 years for the plan, with annual/biannual work planning to set shorter priorities.
Actions: No formal vote to adopt the action list occurred at this meeting; staff will return with revised materials and working-group recommendations at a subsequent meeting.
Proper names
- Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) - City of Bend
Searchable_tags:["CCAP","prioritization","GHG_modeling","council_goals","implementation"]

