Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enrollment And Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Region 15 superintendent: district at enrollment trough now; modest growth expected, staffing added to meet needs

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Smith told the Regional School District 15 Board of Education on Jan. 3 that the district’s official October 1 enrollment snapshot — the Average Daily Membership used by the state of Connecticut — shows the district at the bottom of a recent enrollment trough but projects a small increase over the next decade.

Superintendent Smith told the Regional School District 15 Board of Education on Jan. 3 that the district’s official October 1 enrollment snapshot — the Average Daily Membership used by the state of Connecticut — shows the district at the bottom of a recent enrollment trough but projects a small increase over the next decade.

The superintendent said the district will use the October 1 count to drive town funding responsibilities and state and federal reporting. "That enrollment...on that day called our ADM...it comes official on October 1," Smith said, adding the number drives "anything that involved the size of the district." He noted the district’s demographers show elementary enrollment rising modestly over the next five years after the current low point.

The district presented a 48-slide enrollment report that the superintendent said will be posted to the district website. The presentation included staffing and demographic details: a net reduction of three elementary classroom teachers year-to-year alongside the addition of specialty positions — culinary, multilingual, learning center, occupational therapy and two math teachers — producing a net increase in some staffing categories even as total student counts fell.

Smith and staff explained some of those changes were driven by specific student needs rather than general classroom demand. He described how fractional staffing lines (for example, increasing special-education FTE from 13.1 to 13.4) reflect part‑time or contracted services: "When you see that we added 0.3 of an employee, it means that we're providing about a day and a half of additional services at the high school," he said.

Board members pressed for detail on classroom impacts. The report cited a net decline of roughly 68 elementary students and three fewer elementary teachers overall; the district said average class size rolled up to about the same year-to-year (about two-tenths fewer students per class overall) but noted individual grade-level shifts. The presentation identified nine open paraeducator positions and said the district employs approximately 639 full‑ and part‑time staff (not counting intermittent substitutes, coaches, cafeteria staff employed under a separate structure, or bus drivers employed under contract with First Student).

Demography and projections: the district uses two sources — New England School Development Council for a high-level view and demographer Mike Zuba for more granular modeling. The superintendent said all three models used in the report show modest elementary growth over the next five years (roughly a 9% increase at the elementary level in that horizon), with increases later rolling into middle and high school.

On projection accuracy, Smith said a five‑year comparison found total K–12 projections were off by about 43 students (about 1%). "Once you're established in our school district, they're very accurate," he said, while noting kindergarten projections remain the most volatile year to year. Board members highlighted the sensitivity of budgeting and capital planning to enrollment forecasts and urged ongoing monitoring of kindergarten registration and housing developments that could alter projections.

Why it matters: enrollment drives apportionment, staffing and long‑range facility planning for the two towns that fund the regional district. Board members said the data will inform budget decisions this spring and are especially relevant to discussions about class sections, parity among the district’s four elementary schools and future facilities planning.

Looking ahead: the superintendent said the full report will be posted online, and board members asked for follow‑ups during the budget cycle about class‑size patterns, middle‑school team sizes and the relationship between program additions and projected enrollment.

Ending: Board members thanked staff for the detailed report and noted further discussions are expected during the upcoming budget process.