Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission reviews proposed Echo guest lodge the applicants say would operate as a residential treatment program and preserve 2,700 acres
Summary
Applicants seeking a conditional-use permit and master plan development for a guest lodge near Echo described the project as a residential treatment facility for people with substance-use disorder and said a 40-year lease would preserve 2,700 acres from future development.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicants seeking a conditional-use permit and master plan development for a guest lodge near Echo described the project as a residential treatment facility for people with substance-use disorder and said a 40-year lease would preserve 2,700 acres from future development.
The project proposal includes a main lodge with 17 guest rooms, two spas, three laundry facilities, living and flex space, therapy rooms, a library, two lounges, dining and kitchen facilities, offices, staff break room, garage and an indoor sports court; a chapel; a greenhouse; a private indoor riding arena; and 10 small cabins along the Weber River. The applicants estimated the total building area at about 60,000 square feet.
The planning staff opened the work session and asked the applicants for feedback prior to a public hearing. Michael D., an applicant, said the team is "not developers" and described the proposal as "a residential treatment center where people would come and stay," distinguishing it repeatedly from an inpatient detoxification facility. "We are not a detoxification facility. That is not what we are proposing," Michael D. said.
Why it matters: The applicants and staff framed the project as filling a perceived gap in Summit County for residential substance-use treatment while preserving a large tract of open space; commissioners pressed for clearer public notice language and possible conditions to limit impacts such as traffic, special events and on-site housing.
Project details and applicant assurances
Michael D. told commissioners the property previously operated as a hunting-and-fishing club and was leased to a river-rafting company. He said members and the landowning Richins family discussed other uses, and applicants negotiated a 40-year lease that, he said, would prevent development of the 2,700 acres while the lease is in effect. "I signed a 40 year lease with the family, and that 40 year lease would keep that 2,700 acres from ever being developed while I'm on that lease," Michael D. said.
Applicants said the facility would accommodate working professionals and others seeking residential treatment for substance-use disorders for stays of varying length and that the program would be "cash pay" rather than reliant on insurance. Julie D., also an applicant, said the center would be "completely drug free" and described plans for 24-hour supervision and regular testing on-site.
Water, wastewater and habitat work
Kelvin, who spoke on utilities, said the team has pursued a water right exchange. "We've exchanged secondary water for a culinary right. That exchange application has been approved by the state, at the memorandum of decision from the state engineer for the quantity of water that we need," Kelvin said, and added that water quality testing met Division of Drinking Water standards for culinary use. Applicants also said they have worked with the Division of Wildlife Resources and the Natural Resources Conservation Service; they said habitat restoration had led to fish and wildlife counts and that NRCS had provided a grant for restoration work.
Commissioners' concerns and staff clarifications
Commissioners raised several recurring concerns: whether the guest-lodge definition in county code would allow weddings or special events; whether the conditional-use permit (CUP) could later be used for other commercial purposes; traffic and access along a dirt frontage road that can be damaged during mud season; on-site and longer-term employee housing; wastewater capacity and limits to future expansion; public notice clarity; and community safety if a client relapsed.
Rich, a commissioner, asked about future flexibility: "Couldn't I hold a wedding at a guest lodge?" Planning staff and other commissioners explained that the county separates some uses ("event center" versus "guest lodge") and that special events are generally managed through a separate special-event permitting process. Staff advised that conditions could be added to the CUP to limit event frequency or attendance if the commission sees that as a mitigation measure.
When a commissioner queried the application materials, Laura, planning staff, read the guest-ranch definition from county code: "A commercial use consisting of recreational activities that may include but are not limited to horseback riding, fishing, hunting, skiing, and snowmobiling. The guest ranch may include overnight lodging, food service, meeting and conference facilities, as well as other uses." She and other staff reiterated that, as proposed, the use fit the guest-lodge definition and that a separate licensed treatment facility (which would trigger state licensing and a different code path) was not being proposed.
On-site services, supervision and relapse management
Applicants said clients would be supervised 24 hours a day (not necessarily by medical staff) and that testing would be frequent. "All our the vulnerability of our clients is a very big concern, and so we're going to have a lot of mechanisms in place to make sure that we could keep our clients safe and and also the community safe," Julie D. said. Commissioners asked about on-site security and emergency response; staff and applicants said they would work with county health and public-safety agencies as the project advances.
Access, traffic and employee housing
Commissioners pressed the applicants on access and seasonal conditions on the frontage road. Applicants said the site is at the end of the frontage road near a Bureau of Reclamation parcel and that one access alternate crosses the railroad tracks. "We actually have a pretty short stretch that we would need to utilize that road," an applicant said, adding they drive the road frequently and that it is plowed. Commissioners flagged the railroad crossing and potential conflicts with recreational users on the road as items to be resolved.
Several commissioners noted the project's potential need for overnight staff and asked about employee housing. Applicants added 10 small cabins in the plan partly to provide seasonal employee or family housing if needed, but said the cabins were not intended as a large permanent housing development. Staff noted the county's limited ability to require workforce housing on the east side but said parties could negotiate mitigation measures and that conditions could be included in the CUP if agreed.
Limits on future expansion
Applicants told the commission the proposed wastewater treatment system was sized for the current project footprint and that any additional development of the 25-acre site would require a new health-department review. Applicants said a plat note requiring new review could be included to limit unintended expansion.
Public notice and outreach
Multiple commissioners urged clearer public notice language so residents understand the project's stated purpose. One commissioner said the packet description available to the public read as a hotel or guest ranch rather than emphasizing the residential treatment element; commissioners recommended the applicants and county staff do outreach and include explanatory slides in the staff report before the public hearing to reduce misunderstanding.
Next steps
This item was a work session and no formal decision was taken. Staff and applicants agreed to return for a public hearing; the date was not specified during the session. Planning staff said they would include additional materials on special-event permitting, event limits, and the applicant's slides in the next staff report. Commissioners suggested possible CUP conditions to limit event frequency, cap overall on-site occupancy or set other traffic and operational limits as mitigation measures.
Ending
The commission closed the work session and resumed the regular agenda. Commissioners thanked the applicants for the presentation and asked staff to compile clearer materials and outreach prior to the public hearing so that neighbors and other stakeholders understand the proposal and its planned restrictions and mitigations.
