Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs Country Haven plat note change allowing utility structures before road widening with tighter wording
Summary
The commission recommended approval of a plat note amendment for Country Haven that allows necessary water infrastructure to be built before Democrat Alley is widened, after amending the language to require the road be widened before issuance of any building permit for a residential structure.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of a plat-note amendment for the Country Haven subdivision that will allow certain utility structures to be installed before Democrat Alley is widened, with modified wording to address neighbor concerns.
Planner Madeline explained the amendment would alter an existing plat note requiring Democrat Alley to be widened to a 24-foot pavement width from SR-248 to the project’s northern property line before issuance of the first building permit. The applicant asked that the note be revised to permit installation of necessary utility infrastructure — specifically a well house (approximately 13 feet tall, roughly 240 square feet) and a booster pump station (about 11.5 feet tall, 78 square feet) — before the road widening occurs. Madeline said staff found the proposed change meets the criteria for a plat amendment and recommended approval.
A nearby resident, Mae Anne Sargent, told the commission the road already has heavy traffic and safety issues: "the road really needs to be repaired before we continue some of this development because it's really hard to drive... it's not safe," she said, identifying herself as a neighbor.
Commissioners discussed language to limit what could be constructed prior to road widening. One commissioner proposed clarifying that the road must be widened before issuance of the first building permit "for any structure" (except necessary utility infrastructure). The applicant replied the use of "structure" was to prevent construction of garages or accessory buildings ahead of widening; the developer said the immediate need was to install a required water tank that arrives soon and cannot be protected without installation during the winter when paving is not practical.
After discussion staff confirmed the infrastructure is intended to meet county standards, that the developer is typically responsible for constructing the road to county standards at the developer's cost (often by hiring private contractors with county inspection), and that the planning commission's action would move the matter forward with findings and conditions in the staff report.
A motion to recommend approval with amended language (requirement fulfilled prior to issuance of the first building permit for any structure, excluding necessary utility infrastructure) was made and seconded. The commission voted unanimously.
The commission’s recommendation will be forwarded consistent with the county's plat approval process; staff noted the county manager typically signs plats and the manager's role may be involved in final plat execution.
