Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House Judiciary Committee advances range of bills including DNA database changes, ‘‘Buddy’s Law’’ and medical parole amendments

2521444 · March 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Judiciary Committee on March 6 advanced a slate of bills, adopting amendments on several and moving others forward for further consideration.

The House Judiciary Committee on March 6 advanced a slate of bills, adopting amendments on several and moving others forward for further consideration.

The committee voted to adopt an amendment to a Department of State Police-sponsored bill on the statewide DNA database, approved legislation increasing the maximum civil recovery for serious injury or death of a pet (commonly referred to in committee as "Buddy's Law"), and moved amendments into House Bill 11-23 that add medical-parole details and a funding provision to expand case review capacity.

Why it matters: the actions change how the state collects and manages DNA samples, raise the civil cap for pet-injury claims from $10,000 to $25,000, and adjust the medical- and geriatric-parole process — including removing the governor from the medical-parole decision pathway and directing $1 million from the Justice Reinvestment Fund to add case examiners. Several items also include procedural changes that affect day-to-day interactions between state government and residents, such as jury excusal rules for nursing/breastfeeding parents and requirements for notification when someone dies in a correctional facility.

DNA database bill (House Bill 259) Claire, a committee staffer, described an amendment "that basically reflects what the Senate did." She said the change "creates an exception for citizen initiated charges and reduces the maximum fine from $10,000 to $1,000." Claire also described the underlying bill as a departmental, housekeeping measure requested by the Department of State Police that "alters the circumstances in which a DNA sample must be collected and stored in the statewide DNA database system, alters the individuals required to collect the DNA samples, and alters the process for collecting the samples,…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans