Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances bill tripling county payments for court-appointed indigent defense
Summary
The Mississippi Senate approved legislation to raise the statutory fees counties pay court-appointed attorneys — tripling current flat rates — and sent the bill to the House after a morning roll call. Supporters said the change aims to retain attorneys in rural areas; critics warned higher pay alone won’t fix public-defense quality.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Mississippi Senate on a morning roll call approved a bill that increases the flat fees counties pay for court-appointed counsel, moving the measure to the House for further action. The bill would triple current statutory payments for appointed attorneys, with a three-year repealer to let lawmakers review the change.
The bill’s sponsor, Senator Hobson, told colleagues the change would not affect the state budget because the fees are paid by counties. “This is a bill that deals with payment of indigent counsel. Although it came to appropriations, this does not affect the state budget in any way,” Hobson said on the Senate floor.
Supporters argued the current pay was so low that some counties struggle to keep lawyers willing to handle indigent cases. Hobson and other proponents noted the existing fee schedule had not been updated in decades and said boosting pay could help retain attorneys in smaller, rural districts. “If you’re only getting paid $200 to handle a case for somebody, it doesn't leave you a lot of incentive to want to take those kind of cases,” Hobson said in floor remarks.
Opponents and questioners emphasized that higher fees alone would not ensure better representation. Senator Hill, during floor discussion, voiced concern about complaints that court-appointed attorneys sometimes do not adequately represent clients, asking whether higher pay would improve attorney performance. Senator Hobson replied that while pay is not the only problem facing public defense, increasing compensation is one step to keep attorneys practicing in underserved areas and to provide a financial incentive to accept appointments.
The measure adjusts multiple line items in the current fee schedule. Under the bill, the flat payment for representation in circuit court that is currently $1,000 would increase to $3,000; similarly, other case-type caps (including capital case and appeal-related fees) would be raised to roughly three times their present levels. The House had proposed larger increases during earlier deliberations, and Hobson said the committee compromise set the multiplier at three.
Senators asked whether the bill would supplant existing county contracts or public-defender arrangements. Hobson said the statute would create maximums rather than mandates and would not override current public-defender contracts: counties that pay defenders by salary or contract would not be forced to change those arrangements.
After a period of questions and floor debate, the Senate adopted committee actions and voted to pass the bill by morning roll call. The measure includes a three-year repealer to let lawmakers assess the effect of the increases and to consider longer-term public-defense reforms.
If enacted, the change would be implemented at the county level and funded by local governments; Hobson and other backers urged subsequent work to address broader public-defense system issues.
The Senate record shows the motion to adopt the committee’s strike-all and advance the bill was made by Senator Hobson and the final passage was recorded by the morning roll call procedure.

