Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedure Closed Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Santa Maria council reconvenes from closed session; approves consent calendar; city reports negotiators received instructions
Summary
After a closed session on labor and real-property negotiations, the Santa Maria City Council approved the consent calendar by unanimous roll call and the city attorney reported negotiators were given instructions consistent with council direction; the city manager said discussions with the firefighters’ union are ongoing.
The Santa Maria City Council recessed for a closed session and reconvened for its regular meeting, then approved the consent calendar by unanimous roll call.
City Attorney Watson reported out of closed session that “with respect to item 3 a, 3 b and 3 c. Instructions were provided to the negotiators, consistent with the direction from council. No further comment is needed.” The closed session items had been read earlier as labor negotiations pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6 and real-property negotiations pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8.
Following the closed session, a council member made a motion “to move and approve the consent items,” which was seconded. The clerk called the roll and the recorded votes were: Mayor Pro Tem Escobedo — “Aye”; Councilmember Aguilar Hernandez — “Aye”; Councilmember Flores — “Aye”; Councilmember Soto — “Aye”; Mayor Patino — “Aye.” The clerk announced the consent calendar approved.
City Manager Rollin Rollins reported on upcoming agenda items, including the general plan annual report, the 2024 fire department annual report, the Measure U annual report, a quarterly encampment response review and a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program review. Rollins also told the council that the city and the fire union “are currently in discussions” and that negotiations “have been very amicable so far.”
What the council did and did not do: The transcript records the closed-session report that negotiators received instructions and records formal approval of the consent calendar. The transcript does not provide details of those instructions, nor does it record any public description of proposed real-property transactions or the terms of ongoing labor negotiations beyond the city manager’s general statement.
Why it matters: Closed sessions on labor and property—and subsequent instructions to negotiators—can presage future public actions (agreements, contracts, property purchases or leases). The unanimous approval of the consent calendar moved routine items forward; the specific consent items were not listed in the recorded excerpt.
Clarifying details: The closed-session topics were read into the record earlier as: a conference with labor negotiators pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6; and conferences with real-property negotiators pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8. The city attorney stated that instructions were provided but did not summarize them in open session.
