Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to broaden who may speak during local public comment; critics warn of access issues
Summary
House Bill 22, advanced 14-7, would allow citizens to speak on matters germane to a governing body rather than limiting comment strictly to items on the published agenda. Supporters say it preserves citizens’ right to redress government; opponents say it could be used to limit or complicate public access.
A Tennessee House committee voted 14-7 to advance House Bill 22, a measure that would expand the scope of public comment at local governing-body meetings so speakers can address matters germane to the body rather than being restricted strictly to agenda items.
Representative Davis, the bill’s sponsor, said the legislation responds to complaints that local rules interpreting last year’s public-comment codification have sometimes prevented citizens from raising concerns that are relevant to the governing body but not explicitly listed on a meeting agenda. "This is just to ensure that people have the ability to redress their government," Davis said, explaining the bill would allow comments that are germane to the body while leaving time, place and manner rules to local governments.
Several members expressed support for the principle of public participation but raised concerns about unintended effects. Representative Powell said constituents who rely on public transportation or cannot take time off work could be disadvantaged if comment opportunities are limited or moved: "My concern here is limiting the ability for the public to come and speak… and that is something I don't think we should ever do." Representative Eldridge said local governments should already welcome public comment and said he would not support the bill but understood the sponsor’s intent. Representative Warner asked for confirmation that local bodies could continue to set reasonable limits on speaker time and the number of speakers; Davis pointed to existing statute (8-44-112) that allows reasonable restrictions on length of comment periods, speaker numbers and advance sign-up.
During debate the sponsor emphasized that the bill preserves local control over time, manner and place restrictions. After a call of the previous question, the clerk announced a 14-7 committee vote advancing the bill to calendar and rules.
