Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to allow narrowly defined cigar bars, sparking public-health opposition
Summary
House Bill 211 would carve out a narrow exemption to Kentucky smoke-free laws for "cigar bars" meeting specific requirements; the committee advanced the bill after testimony from the sponsor and extensive opposition from public-health witnesses who warned the change would undermine local smoke-free ordinances and worker protections.
The Senate State and Local Government Committee on Monday advanced House Bill 211, a bill that would create a narrow statewide exemption allowing indoor cigar smoking at businesses defined as "cigar bars" if they meet specific revenue and access requirements.
Representative Chris Lewis, the sponsor, described the exemption as limited: a cigar bar must derive at least 15% of gross annual revenue from sale of cigars, pipe tobacco, related accessories or humidor rentals; it must generally maintain an on-premise retail drink license unless a local government permits operation without alcohol; and no one under 21 may enter. The bill also requires a "smoke-free delivery space" so delivery drivers and mail carriers have an area where packages can be left without exposure to indoor smoke, and existing cigar bars would be grandfathered from that particular requirement.
Multiple public-health witnesses urged the committee to vote no. Ellen Hahn, representing Nurses Stand Up for Health, said that strong, comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws have saved lives and money and that the bill would "undo, in my opinion, 20 years of progress." Michael Gieske, a family medicine physician testifying for St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Breathe Easy Northern Kentucky and the American Cancer Society, and Tim Mullet, a thoracic surgeon at Markey Cancer Center, warned that secondhand smoke from cigars is dangerous and that exemptions would harm workers and patrons. Doug Hogan of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network argued the bill would "prevent local leaders from being able to fully enforce those local ordinances" and would perpetuate a false narrative that cigar smoke is less harmful.
Several senators said they would support the bill on grounds of personal freedom, local permitting and protections in the bill such as the delivery-space requirement. Senator Adams said he has historically sided with public health but supported this bill as respecting personal freedom while providing worker protections; Senator Maiden said the bill preserves local permitting and permit requirements in the text. Senator Chambers Armstrong expressed opposition, noting that similar local efforts in Louisville failed.
The committee recorded the final vote as 8-2 in favor of advancing the bill. The transcript does not include a fiscal note or a detailed enforcement plan for the disclosure and delivery-space provisions.
