Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel hears SB168 to limit duration of cannabis administrative holds and increase package sizes
Summary
SB168 would require the Cannabis Compliance Board to adopt procedures and time limits for administrative holds and align package size limits with recent daily purchase limit increases. Sponsors said the bill protects businesses from indefinite holds; industry groups supported changes and patient advocates urged specific patient protections.
Sen. Rochelle Wynne presented Senate Bill 168 to the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee on March 7, asking the committee to adopt statutory standards requiring the Cannabis Compliance Board (CCB) to adopt procedures for administrative holds and to increase certain cannabis packaging size limits to match last session's raised daily purchase allowances.
What the bill does: Section 1 directs the CCB to adopt regulations setting procedures for administrative holds, requires the board to notify the establishment at the time a hold is issued, and establishes a 14‑day automatic termination of a hold unless the board, after notice and a hearing, extends the hold. Sponsors said they are open to changing the 14‑day trigger to a longer short period (for example, 30 days) to accommodate open‑meeting requirements. Section 2 raises package size limits — including usable cannabis from 1 ounce to 2.5 ounces — and adjusts concentrate and topical package limits to reflect higher daily purchase caps passed last session.
Sponsor rationale: Sen. Wynne described "administrative holds" as a pause while the CCB investigates a product; unlike recalls, holds can prevent sale and require retailers to pull items. "Sometimes these pauses can last for many, many months," Wynne said, and noted that holds that are later released can cause financial loss when product expires in storage. She said the bill balances CCB's investigative authority with protections for businesses.
Industry support: Multiple industry witnesses urged passage. Will Adler (Green Thumb Industries) recalled an administrative hold that lasted about a year and said firms were forced to destroy expired product that could not be sold. The Nevada Cannabis Association, Deep Roots Harvest and several licensees spoke in favor, with testimony noting the bill's packaging updates follow the legislature's earlier increase in daily purchase limits.
Patient concerns and neutral testimony: Several patient advocates and individuals requested changes or asked for stronger patient protections. The Coalition for Patient Rights asked the committee to accept an amendment to add patient protections and requested the committee accept materials submitted shortly before the hearing. Vicky Higgins urged amendments on labeling, including indicating whether a product was irradiated, and suggested shifting some patient program responsibilities to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Process and oversight: Sen. Wynne noted the CCB and its rulemaking are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act and that any CCB regulations implementing the bill would be reviewed by the Legislative Commission. Sponsors and industry witnesses said they had discussed amendments and expect further stakeholder work.
No vote: The committee did not vote on SB168 during the hearing. Sponsors asked the committee to consider the bill favorably with technical amendments to clarify language (for example, replacing the word "disturb" with "distribute" where appropriate) and to refine timelines in consultation with the CCB.
Ending: Supporters framed SB168 as a targeted fix to reduce indefinite administrative holds and to align packaging limits with consumer demand and prior legislative changes. Patient advocates asked for additional protections and labeling changes; sponsors said they would continue stakeholder engagement.
