Survey shows majority support for large bond; Minnetonka schools present scaled-back $85 million option to limit tax impact

Board members spent the study session on Feb. 20 reviewing a community survey of facility priorities and a scaled-down bond proposal intended to reduce near-term tax impact while addressing prioritized instructional and security needs.

Peter Leatherman of Morris Leatherman Surveys reported results from a statistically random sample of roughly 625 residents conducted Jan. 23'Feb. 5 (margin of error about — percentage points). Leatherman said the district received favorable ratings on quality and financial management and that, when asked about a $142 million bond referendum described in the survey (presented to respondents with an example cost of about $9 per month on a $500,000 home), 64% of respondents supported the package as described.

Paul Bourgeois, executive director of finance and operations, presented a new "option C" that he said narrows the package to about $83 million in projects plus about $2 million for an EPIC security system (roughly $85 million total). Bourgeois said the smaller option concentrates on work the facilities task force prioritized as most directly tied to instruction: new and renovated science rooms at both middle schools, additional flex and small-group rooms across elementary sites, cafeteria and serving-line improvements at the high school, performance venues and upgraded gym space at middle schools, bus loop improvements, and targeted renovations at several elementary buildings. Bourgeois said district staff estimate the median homeowner would face about $4.99 per month under the smaller bond and that the net new levy in year one would be roughly $1.8 million, producing a 2.64% tax impact on next year's levy.

Board members discussed trade-offs between seeking a larger package now versus phasing projects, noting state operating-referendum caps remain unresolved and that tax pressures at the city and county level increase voter sensitivity to local school tax requests. Leatherman advised that an early-year survey showing support in the 60% range generally indicates a viable campaign but that support can shift and that effective campaign effort and get-out-the-vote work are important.

The board did not vote to put a measure on the ballot. Instead the board agreed to return on March 13 for a public presentation and to consider approving the package for submission to state review and comment, giving the board additional decision points in June and August before any ballot placement.