Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Religious Freedom Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee hears bill to codify students' religious rights; sponsor agrees to clarify distribution method
Summary
Senate Bill 223 would compile and summarize existing religious-rights protections for students and employees and require distribution to school communities; the sponsor agreed to return with clarifications on distribution and scope.
Senate Bill 223 — described by sponsor Senator Johnson as a recodification and summary of existing constitutional and statutory protections for religious expression in public schools — was discussed at length and pulled from consideration pending clarification and an amendment.
Senator Johnson told the committee the measure "doesn't add any new rights or take away any rights" but would "recognize and recodify" rights so students, parents and employees understand existing protections. He said the bill would require public schools to provide a copy of the act at the start of each school year. He asked that the committee excuse him while a staff attorney provide additional legal context.
Stephanie Nichols, introduced as "a staff attorney for Family Council" and a former Alliance Defending Freedom attorney, testified the bill "is a legally sound articulation of existing rights," said that "students and teachers in public school systems do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate," and argued the measure would reduce misunderstandings that lead schools to improperly prevent students from possessing or reading religious texts.
Senators questioned how the bill would treat religious texts other than the Bible and asked why the statute cited in the bill (described in testimony as Arkansas Code section 6-16-1145 in committee discussion) specifically authorizes an "academic study of the Bible" but the new bill references "Bible or other religious text." Senator Flowers and others pressed whether the bill should explicitly authorize academic study of other religious texts as well.
Committee members also raised practical concerns about the bill's distribution requirement. Several senators suggested the summary should be posted to district websites or emailed to parents rather than printed and sent home with every student; sponsor Johnson agreed to work with the House sponsor on clarifying language and the bill was pulled so an amendment could be prepared.
No final committee vote was taken. Committee chair and members indicated they expect an amended version to return for a subsequent hearing.
