Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee votes: ITL on two items, unanimous approval for four education measures
Summary
The House Education Policy Committee recommended "inexpedient to legislate" on HB662 and HCR6 and voted unanimously to advance several other bills and an education resolution during its Feb. 20 session.
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Education Policy Committee on Feb. 20 recommended "inexpedient to legislate" (ITL) for House Bill 662, which would have required showing named abortion‑related videos in school health classes, and for House Concurrent Resolution 6, a resolution seeking removal of a District 67 superintendent. Both items were ITL'ed by voice vote and recorded roll calls.
The committee advanced, unanimously or by consent, several other measures: House Resolution 9 (urging the Department of Education to emphasize STEM education) and multiple bills including HB 440 (educator licensing, as amended) and HB 222 (repealing a memorandum‑of‑understanding requirement for charter schools and districts) were reported out with "ought to pass" recommendations. Most committee roll calls on those items were recorded as 18‑0 in favor.
Why it matters: The committee’s recommendations determine which bills reach the full House floor and shape what policies receive further legislative attention. ITL recommendations typically end a bill’s progress in that chamber; an "ought to pass" recommendation advances the measure for further consideration.
Most important outcomes
- HB 662 (health education: specified abortion videos): Motion to ITL carried — recorded as 18 to 0. The maker of the ITL motion said specifying required videos and involving the attorney general for enforcement went too far. The committee discussion focused on curriculum control and enforcement concerns.
- HCR 6 (resolution seeking removal of a District 67 superintendent): Motion to ITL carried — recorded as 18 to 0. Committee members cited ongoing court matters and concerns about setting a precedent for calling for removal while litigation proceeds.
- HR 9 (urging the Department of Education to emphasize STEM education): Committee recommended "ought to pass" — recorded as 18 to 0. Members praised student testimony and saw the resolution as largely nonpartisan.
- HB 440 (educator licensing): Committee approved "ought to pass" as amended (amendment 01888h clarifying that an assessment applies to initial licensing rather than renewals) — amendment carried 18 to 0; OTPA as amended carried 18 to 0.
- HB 222 (repealing the MOU requirement between charter public schools and districts regarding services for students with disabilities): Committee recommended "ought to pass" — recorded as 18 to 0. Testimony from the Charter School Alliance and supporters said oversight already exists and the statutory MOU lacked enforcement mechanisms.
- HB 719 (repeal of the right‑of‑first‑refusal for charter schools to lease or buy unused district facilities): Motion to ITL carried; committee recorded the tally as 17‑2‑1 (as announced by the clerk). Members said the problem appeared limited and recommended monitoring before changing law.
Votes at a glance (committee actions)
- HB 662 — Motion: ITL; outcome: failed (committee ITL recommendation); tally announced: 18 yes, 0 no. - HCR 6 — Motion: ITL; outcome: failed (committee ITL recommendation); tally announced: 18 yes, 0 no. - HR 9 — Motion: Ought to pass; outcome: approved; tally announced: 18 yes, 0 no. - HB 440 — Amendment 01888h (adds wording clarifying "initial license"): amendment passed 18‑0. Motion: Ought to pass as amended; outcome: approved 18‑0. - HB 222 — Motion: Ought to pass; outcome: approved 18‑0. - HB 719 — Motion: ITL; outcome: failed (committee ITL recommendation); tally announced by clerk as "17‑2‑1." (Clerk’s readout: 17 yes, 2 no, 1 recorded as a different status in the roll.)
What the numbers mean: Committee vote tallies were read aloud by the clerk during roll calls; most uncontested items recorded unanimous support (18‑0). Where roll calls differed (HB 719), the clerk announced the specific tally. Committee members used ITL to recommend against further legislative action on bills they judged unnecessary or premature; they used "ought to pass" to advance bills or resolutions the committee supported.
Provenance: committee transcript passages for each recorded roll call and motion are the basis for the tallies cited here.

