Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Liquor License topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

West Warwick council approves Ole Restaurant liquor license after resident raises safety and parking concerns

2497495 · March 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The West Warwick Town Council, acting as the liquor commission, voted to approve a Class BB liquor license for Ole Restaurant LLC during its March 4 meeting at Town Council chambers, 1170 Main Street.

The West Warwick Town Council, acting as the liquor commission, voted to approve a Class BB liquor license for Ole Restaurant LLC during its March 4 meeting at Town Council chambers, 1170 Main Street.

The license approval came after brief council action and public comment from a nearby property owner, who said he feared expanded service at the location could create noise and parking issues for residents living above and behind the building.

Timothy Burke, who said he owns the property at 933 Main Street and lives at 210 South Road in Exeter, told the council he opposed granting additional liquor service at the site. “I don't see the need for adding that there,” Burke said, and later added he was “worried about… when they get people get into hot drinking, sometimes it causes problems.” Burke said the building contains multiple rental units and nearby businesses and that rear parking is inadequate.

Council members proceeded with the motion to approve the license; a councilor called for the question and the meeting record shows the ayes prevailed. Council members and staff also told Burke and the chamber that issuance of any license is subject to required departmental approvals. The clerk's office will not issue the license until building, sewer and fire sign‑offs and other department approvals are complete, and the council indicated enforcement or follow‑up would occur through the town's normal complaint channels.

Burke asked what recourse he would have if problems arise after the license is issued; councilors said he could bring complaints to future public comment periods and the town would review any documented incidents. No formal conditions attached to the license were announced at the meeting.

The council approved several other routine business licenses and conducted an ordinance second reading and appointments during the same March 4 session, but the liquor license and Burke's public comment were the only items related to alcohol licensing that drew extended remarks.

The council's action does not immediately allow alcohol service at the location: final administrative approvals remain pending, and town officials said they will monitor complaints if they occur.