Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Discipline advisory panel recommends PBIS training, summer code-of-conduct work and restorative-practice training

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A temporary advisory committee on district discipline recommended the district send administrators to Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) training, ask administrators to draft a consistent code-of-conduct over the summer, and formalize restorative-practice training for staff.

A temporary advisory committee on district discipline presented a set of recommendations to the School Committee on March 4, urging a districtwide alignment of disciplinary philosophy and recordkeeping.

The panel reported uneven approaches to discipline across buildings and inconsistent entries in the student information system (Aspen). To address that, the committee recommended sending administrators (middle- and high-school leads and elementary administrators) to PBIS training this May, asking administrators working over the summer to draft a district-wide code of conduct, and establishing a “train-the-trainer” restorative-practices program so leaders in each building can implement consistent restorative discipline strategies the following school year.

The committee also flagged Aspen as an imperfect tool for documenting behavior incidents; members urged clearer entry standards or alternative tracking so the district can monitor disparities and measure intervention outcomes. Committee members praised student participants for frank feedback and recommended that students, families and teachers be included in the code-of-conduct drafting process.

The temporary committee’s chair and supporting members told the School Committee they have completed their assigned review and suggested either renewing the advisory group in a different form or transferring responsibility for implementation and monitoring to administrators and district staff. Committee members asked the administration for a plan describing who will do post-recommendation work, timelines and how the district will continue to gather student and family input.

Ending: The committee asked the administration to describe next steps — who will lead implementation, whether the advisory group should be re-chartered for monitoring, and a timeline for training and handbook updates. No binding policy changes were adopted at this meeting.