Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves 'Distraction-Free Education' bill banning personal cell phones in K–8 classrooms bell-to-bell
Summary
House Bill 340 requires schools to implement bell-to-bell bans on personal cell phones for grades K–8 (with IEP/504/medical exemptions), giving local systems flexibility beyond grade 8; the bill passed 143–29 after floor debate about implementation and emergency exceptions.
The Georgia House approved House Bill 340, the "Distraction-Free Education Act," by a recorded vote of 143–29, a measure that requires K–8 schools to implement a bell-to-bell prohibition on students' personal mobile phones during the school day. The law exempts students with IEPs, 504 plans or documented medical needs and leaves districts discretion to adopt policies for grades beyond eighth grade.
Sponsor Representative Scott Hilton told the chamber the policy is aimed at reducing distraction and returning classrooms to instruction-focused environments. "When you get the cell phones out of the classroom, teachers can teach and kids can learn," Hilton said on the floor, adding that several districts reported improvements in behavior and classroom attention after adopting local bans.
Floor questions focused on narrow but practical issues: how teachers and administrators should handle emergencies, students' medical needs (for example, blood-sugar monitoring), and the use of e-readers or district-provided devices for instruction. Sponsors said local districts maintain flexibility to issue policies and to accommodate medical needs; opponents requested language clarifying e-reader and assistive-technology exemptions.
Passage and next steps: The House recorded 143 yeas and 29 nays. Sponsors said they expect districts to adopt policies and to develop local procedures for emergency communications and exceptions; they also recommended follow-up consultations to clarify device definitions and accommodations for special-needs students.
Public reaction in debate: Lawmakers supportive of the bill emphasized classroom focus and cited examples of reduced incidents of organized fights, bullying and academic distraction. Opponents cautioned about unintended consequences for families who rely on phone communication for pick-up coordination and for students who use devices for legitimate medical needs.
Implementation note: The bill delegates much of the implementation detail to local school systems, and sponsors urged districts to include clear emergency protocols and to preserve medical and special-education exceptions.
