Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Field Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Santa Clara staff, youth sports leaders debate resident discounts and new nonprofit category for field permits
Summary
City staff and youth sports representatives discussed proposed field permit fee changes, including a 50% discount for organizations with 75% resident rosters and a proposed new "category 5" for youth nonprofits with lower residency thresholds. Staff will bring a fee recommendation to the Parks and Recreation Commission; no formal vote was taken.
City parks staff and youth sports leaders discussed proposed changes to field permit fees and a possible new category for youth nonprofit groups during a Parks and Recreation staff meeting. Staff described a draft that would give a 50% permit-fee discount to organizations with at least 75% Santa Clara residents on their rosters and considered adding a separate category for youth nonprofit groups that fall below that threshold.
The discussion matters because it affects who gets priority access to limited field space and how much groups would pay. Staff and users said the city is trying to balance cost recovery for field maintenance with preserving affordable access for Santa Clara youth.
Kim Castro, Parks and Recreation Manager, described the staff proposal to reduce category 2 nonprofit youth groups’ field permit fees by half if 75% or more of rostered participants are Santa Clara residents. "The proposal was for this category only... having at least 75% or more residents on their roster would pay a reduced permit fee of 50%," Castro said.
Staff presented an example: a hypothetical $8 hourly permit would drop to $4 an hour under the 50% discount. Castro and other staff said the city’s objective for the fees is cost recovery; they also said implementing a discount would require other categories to make up lost revenue.
Members of the youth-sports community debated a separate proposal, advanced by AYSO and other groups, to add a new youth-nonprofit category (referred to in the meeting as "category 5") for organizations that are city-based but do not meet the 75% residency threshold. Under staff discussion, that category would require the organization to be based in Santa Clara and could include a lower residency test (staff suggested a 15% residency line for discussion) or a sliding-scale discount tied to the percentage of rostered residents.
Michael Hsu, identified in the meeting as "Michael Hsu, AYSO, Region 64, Regional Commissioner," said staff had adjusted the proposal after feedback and worked on terminology so groups would be clearly categorized. Hsu noted the intent was to recognize organizations with meaningful local participation even if they do not meet the higher residency threshold.
Several in-person participants cautioned that adding more user categories could dilute limited field inventory and reduce playing opportunities for Santa Clara youth. One participant who identified themselves as representing city-based youth sports said expanding categories could "dilute the opportunity for Santa Clara kids" by increasing competition for the same fields. Others argued a sliding-scale discount that credits the share of city residents on a roster would address fairness concerns while preserving priority for fully resident groups.
Staff said the city would keep the baseline qualification that an organization be based in Santa Clara to be eligible for any new category or discount. They also described next steps: staff will prepare a fee proposal for review by the Parks and Recreation Commission; staff told meeting participants they expected to present the proposal to the commission in March and then to the city council in April, with exact council timing described as part of the follow-up materials.
No formal motion or vote on fee changes or a new category occurred during the meeting. Staff said they will include the range of views from this dialogue in the staff report to commissioners and council members so interested groups can comment during the public process.
Staff also discussed administrative details tied to permitting, including a proposed cancellation fee to discourage over-reservation, the possibility of a lottery system to allocate practice slots in two-hour increments, and a plan to pilot an allocation process so groups and staff can evaluate how it works before any final policy adoption. Angelique (staff) laid out the current practice of collecting requests, staff negotiating overlaps, and the desire to move to a more transparent, lottery-based allocation for weekday practice time.
The meeting concluded with staff committing to draft language and share it with user groups before the formal commission report so organizations can prepare comments for the public hearings.
