Payson staff propose broad fee schedule changes across airport, library, parks, police and utilities

2494269 · March 4, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a March 4 work study, department heads presented proposed changes to municipal fees and fines that staff said are intended to reflect cost recovery, inflation and new services; the proposals will go to a public hearing in April and, if approved, take effect July 1.

Payson department leaders presented a package of proposed fee changes and clarifications at the March 4 work session covering airport access and penalties, community development and building fees, engineering equipment rates, fire department response and stand-by charges, library meeting-room fees, parks and recreation event fees, police booking and jail fees, and water service deposits and related fees.

Why it matters: Municipal fees and fines finance parts of town operations, influence access to public facilities and reflect the town's cost recovery policies. Council will consider the proposals at a public hearing in April and may adopt a revised schedule that would start July 1.

Highlights of proposed changes

- Airport: The airport director proposed raising a gate card fee to $20 (from $5) per card and setting new transient aircraft parking rates for large firefighting helicopters; introduced a $100 penalty for illegal vehicle use of the Bravo Gate and a $100 fine for dogs off leash on airport property. The director said the airport will send the proposals to the Airport Commission for review before council action.

- Community development / engineering: Staff proposed rewording and raising several permit fees to better reflect inspection costs (for example, temporary certificate-of-occupancy-related inspection fees), and cleaning up the technology improvement fee and demolition-permit language. Engineering seeks to remove daily/weekly equipment rental rates in favor of an hourly rate.

- Fire: The fire chief presented modest increases in out-of-area response and inspection fees and a clarified schedule for fire-guard and standby services. The department said it bills insurers or responsible parties for many response-related fees.

- Library: The library director proposed eliminating fees related to kitchen use (which the library stopped offering during COVID) and changing the meeting-room policy: the new proposal would charge $100 for two hours and $25 for each additional hour (previously $100 for up to four hours); nonprofits and government users would remain exempt.

- Parks and Recreation and bed-tax-funded items: Staff proposed modest increases (for example, raising the rodeo/event center daily rental fee slightly) and asked council to consider whether bed-tax revenues should fund sign and corridor beautification projects or be used in part to support event-center needs. Councilors discussed limits on sponsorship tiers and whether to retain an upper cap on sponsorship/in-kind donations.

- Police: The police chief proposed adopting a booking fee for arrested individuals and confirmed the town follows Gila County for jail housing fees; staff said most fee recovery comes from insurance or billed defendants.

- Water: The water superintendent proposed raising security deposits (owner deposits from $100 to $150; rental deposits to $225), modest increases in meter- and service-related fees and a higher shop-test meter fee to recover actual test costs. Staff said some meter testing and service-call fees previously did not cover actual inspection labor.

Process and next steps: Staff told the council the proposed fees are being submitted under state statute A.R.S. §9-499.15 for municipal fee regulation and that the fees will be posted for public comment. The council will hold a public hearing in April and consider a resolution in May; if adopted, new fees would take effect July 1.

Ending note: Several councilors asked staff to provide clearer collection processes (for example, how the $100 Bravo Gate fine would be assessed and collected) and to ensure that proposed increases are transparent and targeted to recover costs rather than to raise general revenue.