Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Carports topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Colleyville holds first reading on carport rules; council hears code changes but takes no action
Summary
Council received a first reading and public hearing on an amendment to Chapter 3, Section 3.27 of the land development code to change when residential carports must obtain a special use permit; staff recommended approval and the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval 6-0, but council took no vote at the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Land Development Carports topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Colleyville City Council on March 4, 2025 held a first reading and public hearing on proposed changes to the city’s land development code regulating accessory buildings and residential carports (Ordinance O-25-2320). Ben Bridal, director of community development, presented the amendments and described the proposal's intent.
Bridal summarized the ordinance changes and the rationale behind them, explaining that the proposal would allow some carports to be built without going through the special use permit process. "A carport specifically is a roof structure ... the main purpose is to park vehicles underneath this structure," Bridal said, while outlining dimensional and design standards under the draft ordinance. Under the draft, a carport could proceed without a special use permit if it is either completely to the rear of the house or not visible from the street; corner lots would still require a special use permit. The amendment also clarifies height limits — a carport cannot be taller than the primary residence — and maintains requirements for paved parking under the cover, a roof pitch of at least 2 in 12, and masonry cladding on posts up to 48 inches.
Bridal said the item was presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission on Feb. 10, which recommended approval 6-0. Staff recommended approval to council at this meeting. The council opened the public hearing; no members of the public spoke. The council did not take action on the ordinance at this meeting (first reading). Council members noted homeowners' association deed restrictions would still supersede city code.
The proposed changes will return to council for a subsequent reading and potential vote after further processing and any additional public input.
