Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Abatements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners grant three property tax abatements after assessor27s recommendations
Summary
Clear Creek County commissioners approved three partial or full abatements after the assessor recommended adjustments; each case involved valuation questions and returned modest refunds for taxpayers.
The Board of County Commissioners on March 4 approved three property tax abatement requests after the county assessor27s office recommended adjustments in each case.
Case 1: Sun Springs (R25-28) The assessor recommended changing the taxable allocation on a mixed-use property to 50% residential / 50% commercial for the 2023 and 2024 tax years. The assessor27s recommended change produced an abatement (refund) of $6,203 for 2023 and $6,224 for 2024. County staff explained that the 2023-24 values were set by sales during the sales period of July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022, and that because the property was purchased in the assessment period, the purchase price set the valuation baseline. Commissioners moved to accept the assessor27s recommendation and approved the partial abatement (motion passed; recorded as ayes in the public transcript).
Case 2: Golden Hill mining-claim parcel (R25-30) The assessor reported she had been working with the owner to verify whether a mining claim bisected the parcel. The owner, Catherine, said she believed the claim was not cut in half and asked the board to accept a corrected legal description. The assessor recommended partial approval for 2023 and denial for 2022; the recommended refund for 2023 was $54.82 in taxes. The applicant confirmed she agreed with the assessor27s correction and the board voted to accept the assessor27s recommendation.
Case 3: Trail-Creek-area vacant lot (David Moshe; R25-30 or similar) The assessor reported the 2024 valuation had incorrectly omitted a steep slope in the front-topography designation; she recommended adjusting the valuation from $42,910 to $23,010 and a tax refund of $4,404.30 (wording as recorded in the assessor27s summary). Commissioners examined aerial/topography and in-person site observations confirmed the slope; they accepted the assessor27s recommendation and approved the abatement.
In each instance the board voted to follow the assessor27s recommendation after staff summarized the sales-period rules that set assessment values for 2023 and 2024. The board noted that for some parcels a purchase during the assessment period can set value for subsequent evaluation years, restricting the assessor27s ability to re-price a property aside from correcting classification (residential vs commercial) or topographic adjustments found during inspection.
Outcome: Three abatement motions to accept assessor recommendations were approved; motions passed by voice vote (ayes recorded; transcript did not list a roll-call breakdown).
