Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Programs And Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews $1.2 million youth engagement package; members press administration over add‑ons and reimbursement rules
Summary
The administration requested authorization of $1,197,000 from the general fund for youth engagement, mentoring and development programs; councilmembers raised questions about transparency after two administration-added recipients (NAACP and Hope Toledo) and about whether awards are reimbursements or advances
Director Fosnoff presented an ordinance on March 11 asking council to authorize $1,197,000 from the general fund for youth engagement, mentoring and development initiatives and to allow the mayor to enter into necessary agreements and declare an emergency.
Commissioner Bush said the Division of Youth Services reviewed 14 grant applicants and identified 87 program partners: 52 summer programs, 32 after-school programs, 23 year-round programs and 27 new programs. The division said selected programs will support year-round and summer services and that awards total $1,197,000.
Councilwoman Consuelo McPherson pressed administration staff about two organizations that she said were not part of the original application process and had been "added on" by the administration: a $27,000 allocation for a NAACP program to send youth to a national leadership competition and a $400,000 allocation for Hope Toledo. McPherson asked whether those organizations would be subject to the same reimbursement rules as other awardees and requested by-referral documentation of the NAACP line-item budget and the Hope Toledo award.
Fosnoff and commissioner Bush said many awards are processed as reimbursements but that the department has in some cases advanced funds to larger, established partners and that the administration may handle individual awards differently when the reimbursement requirement is a barrier to program delivery. Fosnoff told council the administration added certain programs after initial selections and said staff would work with recipients on reconciliation and reporting.
Councilmembers asked for additional documentation and clarity on application scoring, which agencies and districts would receive funds, and which programs run in summer versus the school year. Several members requested referrals so staff could return with detailed budgets, program durations and reconciliation plans. Council accepted the item for first reading.
