Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Tax Policy Trigger topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears Senate Bill 259 to trigger income tax rate cuts when inflation‑adjusted revenues exceed baseline
Summary
Senate Bill 259 would require the director of budget to certify excess inflation‑adjusted general revenue collections and convert the excess into automatic income tax rate reductions, first lowering individual rates to 4.5% then applying reductions to corporate surtaxes. Supporters called the measure a competitive tool; opponents warned it would
Senate Bill 259 would set a statutory mechanism by which excess inflation‑adjusted general revenue collections could trigger future income tax rate reductions, supporters told the Kansas Senate Tax Committee.
Amelia, committee staff, summarized the bill: on Aug. 15 each year the director of budget would determine whether general revenue fund collections for the prior fiscal year exceeded an inflation‑adjusted baseline. If so, the excess would be converted into an income tax rate reduction for the following tax year. Reductions would first lower individual income tax brackets until both reached 4.5%; any further reductions would be applied to corporate surtaxes until combined corporate rates equaled 4.5%.
Dennis Hall of Americans for Tax Reform and Eric Stafford of the Kansas Chamber urged passage, saying automatic, revenue‑triggered reductions would improve competitiveness and appeal to businesses and workers. "This bill tells prospective new residents that Kansas lawmakers are prioritizing them and their pocketbooks," Hall said. Supporters pointed to other states with triggers, including North Carolina and West Virginia, and said the approach protects lawmakers from committing to cuts in recessions because the trigger requires actual revenue growth above inflation.
Banking and business stakeholders asked for clarifications on how privilege taxes for financial institutions would be handled. Alex Orell of the Kansas Bankers Association requested statutory language or a chart to translate corporate rate reductions to the privilege tax that applies to banks.
Opponents, including Leah Filter and Donna Ginther, a professor and director at the Institute for Policy and Social Research, said the bill would impose permanent constraints on the budget and risk cutting revenues that pay for education and other services. Ginther warned that automatic cuts based on temporary revenue increases could leave the state underfunded in downturns and noted areas of existing underfunding such as special education and early childhood programs.
Committee members asked for more analysis and noted the bill would be worked later in the week alongside other revenue bills. No committee vote was recorded during the hearing.
