Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Exemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ramsey County commissioners table request for tax exemption tied to federal wetland easement
Summary
Commissioners postponed action after staff described legal ambiguity around a Century Code exemption for land in a federal wetland easement and asked for more information from NRCS and state agencies.
Commissioners of Ramsey County on March 4 voted to table a request from a landowner seeking a tax exemption tied to a federal wetland (inundated land) easement—citing unclear statutory language and possible broader countywide effects.
County Tax Director Beth (presenting) told the board a landowner had asked to exempt two parcels under a Century Code provision for inundated land but that the exemption process and forms are unclear and rarely used. Beth said she had tried to find precedent and had contacted other county tax directors and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) but found little local experience and several interpretive questions.
The county's legal advisor reviewed the packet and described the statute as permissive—that is, the county may remove qualifying land from the tax rolls but is not required to do so. He and Beth said the easement documents appeared valid and suggested additional factual questions for the landowner and federal agencies, including whether the landowner receives payments from the easement and whether any drainage activity benefits other parcels in or outside Ramsey County.
Commissioners raised concerns about equal application and potential administrative burdens if the exemption were applied broadly. Officials noted uncertainty about whether inundated easements in other counties or held by US Fish and Wildlife (29,000 acres were cited broadly) would be affected.
After discussion, a commissioner moved and a second was recorded; the board voted to table the matter pending further information from NRCS, engineering data (shape files) and clarification about any payments to the landowner and geography of lands benefiting from drainage.
The board directed staff to continue fact-finding and bring back a recommendation later; commissioners said the county should ensure any decision would be applied consistently to future applicants.
Beth and county counsel warned that, because the statute has little case law, judicial interpretation could differ if the commission eventually denies an application and the landowner appeals.
The tabling preserves the landowner's renewed request on the county's backlog while staff pursues clarifying information.
