Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Work Program Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council narrows city work program priorities, adds City Hall retrofit and annex with EOC to top list
Summary
After a ranking exercise, Cupertino council directed staff to refine an 18-item top list for the two-year city work program and voted to add the City Hall retrofit and Torrey Annex renovation, including migration of the emergency operations center, to the prioritized items.
The Cupertino City Council on March 3 narrowed the set of proposed projects that will form the next two-year city work program and directed staff to return with refined scopes and funding estimates. Councilors and staff spent the meeting validating goals, breaking into a ranking exercise, and reconvening to review the tallied results.
As part of that action, the council voted to add a City Hall seismic retrofit and Torrey Annex renovation that includes migration of the city's emergency operations center (EOC) to the work program. The motion to add the City Hall item carried 3–2, with Council members Fruin and Mohan recorded as No; Council member Wong, Vice Mayor Moore and Mayor Chow voted Aye.
What the council decided: Staff ran a moderated ranking process in which each council member used a scoring sheet to prioritize proposed projects. Staff then produced a consolidated list showing high-, medium- and low-ranked items. Council asked staff to refine project language and resource estimates and come back during upcoming budget and CIP reviews; staff said it would present funding and staffing implications in April and a final set of recommended items for adoption in May–June.
City Hall item: The approved language for the City Hall item reads, in part, “City Hall retrofit and City Hall annex renovation, including the EOC; implement the previously approved 2022 council plan with EOC migration.” Following the vote, some council members asked staff to insert minutes and prior motions into the project description so prior council direction is preserved.
On next steps, Tina (staff member) said staff will collect the voting sheets, refine scopes where projects overlap and bring back a recommended list plus resource implications. She told the council the process is intended to provide a 'bite-sized' set of priorities that staff can deliver over the two-year program rather than an unwieldy large list.
The vote on the City Hall item was taken after a staff-led discussion and a motion at the council dais; the clerk recorded Fruin and Mohan voting No and the motion carrying 3–2. Staff said CIP prioritization will also return in April, and items that belong in CIP rather than the city work program will be handled in that separate process.
