Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Investigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Superintendent: educator on administrative leave while district investigates social‑media post; public calls for clearer policies

6493930 · September 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Dr. West said an educator at Neil Armstrong Middle School is on administrative leave while the district investigates a social‑media post. Public commenters at the Sept. 23 meeting urged stronger social‑media rules to protect students; some residents invoked the First Amendment and urged respect for due process.

The Forest Grove School District superintendent told the school board on Sept. 23 that an educator at Neil Armstrong Middle School is on administrative leave while the district investigates a social‑media post, and she asked the community to allow the district’s investigative process and personnel procedures to run their course.

"Our educator remains on a head administrative leave while we conduct our investigation," Superintendent Dr. West said. She told the board and public the district has received strong and varied viewpoints from the community and that personnel decisions are guided by district policy, contractual obligations and state law. "When our investigation is complete, we will communicate the outcome with our community. Until then, we ask for your patience and trust as we follow through the due process," she said.

Community members used the public‑comment period to press for both enforcement and restraint. Kelly Jones, a Forest Grove parent, urged the board to review and strengthen district policies governing staff conduct on social media and reminded the board that the staff handbook already requires educators who comment on controversial issues to state those opinions are personal and to treat students, colleagues and the public with respect. Jones said the district should take stronger action where posts "celebrate or condone violence" and threaten students' sense of safety.

Other commenters framed the issue as a free‑speech concern. Sandra Landis, a Forest Grove resident, cited legal precedent and the First Amendment, referencing Texas v. Johnson and a New York Times item: "Public institutions like Forest Grove School District are bound to uphold the First Amendment," she said, while also acknowledging limits on board comment during an active personnel investigation.

Board leaders reiterated rules for public comment during active investigations. The board chair reminded speakers that public calls for specific consequences against an identified employee tied to an ongoing investigation would be interrupted by the chair and could cause the chair to end public comment for the evening: "If someone calls for consequences for a specific staff member tied to an active investigation, I will pause them with the gavel and I will move on to the next person," the chair said.

Superintendent Dr. West emphasized the district's commitment to student safety and to following formal investigative procedures. She said administrators and staff across the district were continuing their regular work and that the district would share results after the review is complete.

No personnel action was reported or taken by the board at the meeting; the matter remains under district investigation.