Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency And Dashboard topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission staff demonstrate contracts dashboard as public commenters press for vendor transparency
Summary
Staff demonstrated an in-progress Tableau dashboard intended to publish contract and grant allocations; public speakers praised transparency but raised concerns about prior sole-source awards and the need for clearer disclosure of subcontracting, incumbent vendors and small-business participation.
Commission staff demonstrated an interactive Tableau dashboard on Sept. 18 that displays the commission's grants and contract allocations and remaining balances. The presentation was part of a wider update on the commission's contracts, grants and transparency efforts.
Lauren Quintero (acting deputy of administration and performance management) and budget staff showed how the dashboard will allow users to filter by funding category, fiscal year and individual contract, and to view obligations versus expenditures. Staff said the tool is a work in progress and that complete historical publishing of hundreds of past contracts will take time; in the interim, staff offered to provide individual contract details by email on request.
Public commenters welcomed the initiative but urged greater disclosure. Larissa Owen asked whether contracts or subcontracting award dollars go to out-of-state firms and repeated-incumbent vendors, and she asked for reporting on the share of funding going to women-, minority- and veteran-owned firms and microbusinesses. Tiffany Murphy asked staff to correct a mislabeled contract entry in the packet (Mental Health America of California's LGBTQIA+ contract was listed under a different advocacy label) and requested continuing revision dates on published contract spreadsheets.
Stacy Hiramoto of the Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition raised a historical concern about a roughly $500,000 University of the Pacific contract that she said appeared in commission materials without notice of competitive solicitation. Brenda Gralich explained the history: the University of the Pacific contract had been used to house funds for exploratory work tied to strategic planning and public engagement; staff said the award and subsequent work were approved by the commission but acknowledged the need for clearer documentation in public materials.
Staff said they plan to expand the dashboard over time and to put more contract-level details online, and they noted the commission already provides meeting announcements and contract amendments in committee materials. The committee asked staff to include revision dates and clearer procurement notes in the public listings.
