Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chancellor warns of system office budget shortfall tied to longstanding appropriation cap; plans for efficiency and possible Besties
Summary
Chancellor Olsen told trustees the system office faces a structural funding cap on its appropriation that has not kept pace with costs. The cap (described in remarks as the current cap of $36 million) and projected payroll and cost increases create a projected shortfall of roughly $6 million (about 17%) in a future fiscal year, prompting a system
Chancellor Olsen told trustees that a statutory dollar cap on the Minnesota State system office appropriation, unchanged in real terms for roughly 15 years, is creating a structural budget shortfall. He said the current cap has been adjusted over time from a prior figure up to $36,000,000 and that ongoing salary and cost increases have eroded purchasing power. That erosion, he said, will create an estimated shortfall of a little over $6,000,000—about 17% of the capped appropriation—by the end of the forecast horizon discussed in committee.
Olsen described steps the system office is taking: a review of operations, identification of “must do” system functions (examples given included general counsel, internal audit, and centralized labor relations), submission of employee-sourced ideas for efficiencies, and a future-state exercise this summer to identify shared-service and other redesign options across campuses and regions. He said the office has engaged Baker Tilly to assist in structuring conversations and that two-thirds of the system office budget is personnel costs.
The chancellor said the office will consider voluntary separation incentives (referred to in the discussion as "bestie" — board early separation incentive) as one tool, along with other personnel and operational changes, and that the administration intends to follow labor contracts and treat employees respectfully. He emphasized a preference to reorganize and find efficiencies internally rather than shifting costs to campuses. The chancellor also noted that any future reductions in state higher-education appropriations would worsen the projected shortfall.
Trustees asked about centralization versus regional shared-service approaches; Olsen responded that some services (for example NextGen and legal counsel) function as systemwide responsibilities while other services could be organized collaboratively campus-to-campus.
Olsen said system leadership has collected dozens of ideas from employees about potential efficiencies and that the leadership team will return to the board with proposals, including potential labor- and contract-related options, over the summer and possibly present a further update in June.
