Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays vote on Duluth Transportation Committee as administration seeks boards-and-commissions realignment
Summary
Councilors discussed Ordinance 14 to create a Duluth Transportation Committee and broader drafts to consolidate several boards and commissions. Administration asked to table the ordinance to negotiate amendments requested by staff and transportation advocates; councilors expressed support but requested clearer plans for staffing and timing.
Duluth City Council members discussed an ordinance that would add Article 38 to the Duluth City Code to establish a Duluth Transportation Committee (item 35, Ordinance 14) and broader work to realign multiple boards and commissions. The administration asked the council to delay final action so staff and advocacy groups could agree on a small set of amendments; councilors and administration said they support the concept but want the changes reviewed before a vote.
Councilor Swenson read several agenda items and the council then reached item 35: “an ordinance amending chapter 2 of the Duluth City Code by adding article 38, establishing the Duluth Transportation Committee.” Councilor Auwel and Councilor Mayo described the Transportation Committee as filling a gap in city policy and said advocates and the mayor have supported the idea. Councilor Auwel noted transportation work has often been reactive and said a permanent commission would allow more proactive review of safety and infrastructure projects.
Senior adviser John Dukic and councilors said they have drafted language and have been consulting with staff and transportation advocates. City Administrator Staling told the council the administration requests additional time to negotiate amendments and return a staff recommendation: “that is a concern of administration. Yes. We would like to consolidate our boards and commissions.” Attorney Lohrer told the council that if revisions are substantial the ordinance may need to return for a first and second reading.
Several councilors, including Councilor Kennedy and Councilor Nephew, said they support the Transportation Committee but asked for updates on the broader boards-and-commissions realignment and warned about staff capacity: some commissions lack quorum or produce no minutes, and adding another commission would require staffing resources. Councilor Nephew said she wanted “an update on the other ones” to avoid overwhelming staff. Councilor Auwel said drafts have been shared with the city attorney and indicated some ordinances or resolutions could come forward in August or September, depending on community and staff input.
No final vote was taken on Ordinance 14 during the meeting. Councilors said they may vote to table the ordinance at an upcoming meeting so staff can return with suggested amendments and a staff recommendation; if amendments are significant, the ordinance would restart the first- and second-reading process.
The council discussed this matter under item 35; staff and councilors agreed to continue negotiations and to seek additional community and staff input before formal adoption.
