Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Precincts And Voter Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve new Mount Pleasant precinct for board review; Mark Apartments relocation debated and tabled

5574778 ยท July 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Madison County Election Commissioners on Aug. 13 approved sending a proposal to create a new precinct at Mount Pleasant Missionary Baptist Church to the Board of Supervisors and debated moving District 3 voters from Mark Apartments before tabling that proposal.

Madison County Election Commissioners on Aug. 13 approved sending a proposal to create a new precinct at Mount Pleasant Missionary Baptist Church to the Board of Supervisors and debated a separate plan to move District 3 voters from Mark Apartments to Mount Charity Baptist Church before tabling the latter motion.

Commissioner Joanne Pearson moved to present a request to the Board of Supervisors to establish a new precinct in District 2 at Mount Pleasant Missionary Baptist Church (proposed precinct number 202). Pearson said the change is intended to reduce pressure on Saint Joseph Catholic Church, which currently serves a large precinct. She told commissioners the new precinct would shift "about 1,300 plus" voters away from Saint Joseph, which she said currently serves roughly 4,000 voters.

Pearson also moved to move District 3 voters from Mark Apartments to Mount Charity Baptist Church (proposed precinct number 303). That motion prompted extended discussion. Commissioners and attendees raised procedural and fairness questions about splitting a precinct so that some voters are moved while others remain at the same site. Several commissioners noted that Mark Apartments had not provided written notice to election officials and that a precinct split must be presented to โ€” and actable by โ€” the Board of Supervisors.

After discussion, the commission voted to table the Mark Apartments motion and to return the item to the commission later so staff can confirm contract status and stakeholder notification. A commissioner suggested additional outreach to the supervisors and affected precinct officials before any transfer of voters is finalized.

Why it matters: Precinct location, availability and capacity affect voter access, lines and parking on election days. Commissioners cited safety and capacity concerns at the Mark Apartments site and cited parking and crowding concerns at sites that currently serve large voter populations.

Key details and process notes: The Mount Pleasant precinct proposal was reported to be on the Board of Supervisors' agenda; the Mount Pleasant change is intended to take effect Dec. 1 and be in place for spring elections in March. Commissioners emphasized that any precinct move or split requires proper notice and Board approval; the commission's role is to recommend changes and present contracts and notices for supervisor action. One commissioner noted contract language at some sites is indefinite until a written termination notice is provided by either party.

Associated scheduling and administrative actions: Commissioners set a special call Aug. 27 at 9 a.m. in the clerk's office to handle time-sensitive election business and also confirmed the commission's next regular meeting as Sept. 8 (an automatic purge date). The special meeting scheduling was tied to candidate qualifying and absentee-ballot timelines ahead of upcoming special elections.

Quotes (from meeting): Commissioner Joanne Pearson: "I would like to make a motion that we, move District 3... from Mark Apartments to Mount Charity Baptist Church... I feel that that location, the building is rather small... the actual voters there would if they all came, would be around 3,200 people." Commissioner (unnamed opposing voice): "You cannot split a precinct and leave another part of the precinct there..." (discussion opposing an immediate split without written notice and supervisor action.)

What remains unresolved: Whether Mark Apartments will submit written notice or a contract termination; the final supervisor decision on the Mount Pleasant proposal; and the exact effective dates pending Board action.

Next steps: Staff will confirm contract status with Mark Apartments and other affected property managers, complete required notices, and present the Mount Pleasant and any reconfigured precinct proposals to the Board of Supervisors for final action. The commission will reconvene on Aug. 27 (special call) and Sept. 8 (regular meeting) to address pending items.