Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council presses for more reporting as county seeks multi‑year animal services contract
Summary
City staff and Riverside County officials discussed a proposed three‑year contract for animal services. Council members sought monthly reporting, clarification of service levels in Indio and assurances the city will receive what it is paying for.
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assistant City Manager Jonathan Nicks and representatives from Riverside County Animal Care Services discussed the county’s proposed extension of the service contract and the county’s request to move from a one‑year agreement to a three‑year term.
Nicks recapped that Riverside County had told city staff it prefers three‑year agreements because it provides consistency across the 16 contract cities it serves and because the county is hiring additional shelter, outreach and marketing staff. The county is also offering phased rate increases over three years. Nicks said the city intends to receive updates mid‑year (November/December) on requested operational reports.
Dr. Mary Martin, introduced at the meeting as a county animal services official, confirmed that seven contract cities in the Coachella Valley receive county services and that county staffing increases are meant to expand sheltering and outreach. No contract was approved at the meeting; the county asked the city to consider a three‑year commitment.
Councilmembers pressed for proof of service levels. Councilmember Gutron said he has driven streets and ‘‘I just don’t see [county] trucks’’ and requested certification that county officers were working in Indio and details about hours and officer assignments. He asked for names, GPS logs or other evidence that staff are patrolling and responding in town.
A county lieutenant answered some operational questions and said trucks fuel in Indio and that county officers split the city into east, west and a floater assignment; he invited councilmembers to ride with officers to see operations firsthand. Councilmember Gutron accepted the offer to ride along. Councilmembers also asked that animal‑services staff participate in community events and special events to increase public awareness about services, adoption and prevention programs.
Staff and council agreed to request monthly communications reports and a mid‑year update; Nicks said he had met privately with county officers who provided additional information about local services and that staff would arrange for a county representative to provide the requested reports. No final decision was made on contract length at the meeting; council requested the additional reporting and a follow‑up presentation before executing a multi‑year agreement.

