Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emerald Ash Borer Private Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members raise private-property ash tree concerns, urge caution over moving wood
Summary
Board members reported clusters of ash trees on private property and advised caution when notifying owners because moving infested wood can spread emerald ash borer; the board reiterated its limited enforcement role and recommended using staff channels for private-property issues.
Get email alerts on the Emerald Ash Borer Private Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members reported seeing several declining ash trees on private property and discussed the limits of the tree board’s authority and the town’s protocol for handling potential emerald ash borer infestations.
A board member said they observed “4” ash trees on Morrison Street that appeared to be in poor condition and noted concern about residents moving cut wood. Members cautioned that notifying property owners directly can risk moving infested branches and spreading emerald ash borer; one member recommended that observations be routed to town staff rather than discussed repeatedly in public meetings.
Why it matters: Emerald ash borer (EAB) is an invasive beetle that can kill ash trees and spreads when infested wood is moved. The board emphasized that the town’s Public Works Department — not the advisory board — is the appropriate channel for hazard abatement on private property and that board members should contact staff (Carl or Public Works Director Kevin) with concerns rather than treating this meeting as an enforcement tool.
Details and guidance from the meeting: Board members relayed that the town’s practice is for Public Works staff to investigate hazards and determine removal and cost responsibility if trees fall into the public right-of-way. Members also noted educational outreach — planting guidance and registered lists of certified tree-care contractors — as the preferred approach for private-property tree care.
No formal enforcement action or treatment program was adopted at the meeting; members agreed to use staff channels for follow-up and to rely on public education to reduce risk from improper wood transport and pruning.

