Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Canvassing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fulton County board will reconsider bipartisan canvassing policy after counsel review following court rulings

5422840 · July 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After executive session and discussion of recent court decisions, Fulton County's Board of Registration and Elections voted to have counsel rework and then present the proposed bipartisan canvassing policy for reconsideration.

The Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections voted July 17 to have counsel further review and revise a proposed bipartisan canvassing policy in light of recent court decisions and to bring the policy back for reconsideration.

The board moved into executive session earlier in the meeting to receive an update on litigation that could affect the proposed canvassing policy. After returning to open session, the board discussed whether to pause, table, or send the policy back to counsel for revision.

Attorney Alexis, the board’s counsel, said the policy needs revising after recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court. “In light of the recent court decisions and after review of this canvas policy, I believe that we may need to rework it just to make sure we're in conformity,” Alexis said.

Member Adams moved to table the canvassing policy entirely; that motion failed for lack of a second. The board then approved a motion to reconsider the policy after counsel has reviewed it and drafted any needed changes. The chair called the vote and recorded it as unanimous in favor of reconsideration.

The board did not adopt a new canvassing policy at the July 17 meeting. The executive session was used to discuss litigation that counsel said could influence the policy's legal conformity; no further details about the litigation were announced in open session.

Ending: Counsel will return with revisions for board consideration at a future meeting; the board requested further review rather than immediate adoption.