Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Workforce Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members table several consent items and seek briefing after discussion of HFC workforce-housing arrangements
Summary
At a Grand Prairie City Council meeting, members agreed to table multiple consent items and asked staff for a briefing after discussing Housing Finance Corporation (HFC) purchases of apartment complexes under workforce-housing rules and a proposed revenue-share from a ground lease.
Get email alerts on the Housing Workforce Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand Prairie City Council members agreed to table multiple consent items and requested a staff briefing after a discussion about apartment complexes purchased by the city’s Housing Finance Corporation under workforce-housing rules.
Mayor Pro Tem Junior Zahnu moved to table item 29, saying the board-appointment packet he received did not show appointments listed for 2025. Council members later asked to table items 15, 24, 25 and 45 and to pull item 18 (and act on it with item 33 together) so a briefing could be provided before final action.
Council members discussed how workforce-housing transactions affect the tax rolls and city revenue. Bill (staff member) explained that when an apartment complex is acquired under the workforce-housing arrangement, 51% ownership goes to the HFC and the property can be removed from the tax rolls. He said the operator or current owner commonly continues to run the property under a contract with the HFC and under a ground lease. A staff presentation on the agenda item proposed that 35% of the ground-lease payment be returned to the city because the city would not be collecting property taxes on the parcel.
Bill said, “The partnership is between HFC and the developers or the owner. The pilot is asking the council to approve a pilot where we would receive 35% of the ground lease. So we we don't have any ownership in it.”
Council members asked for additional details to be returned to the council. Council member Headen asked what percentage of units would be required as workforce-housing at one complex. Staff replied the required percentage is negotiated with the HFC and can range from about 20% to 80% and that staff would review the documents and report back. A separate remark noted one recent project required 10% workforce units.
Staff identified the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) as the agency that sets who qualifies for workforce-housing units and the rent-reduction levels; staff said qualifying households are typically at or below 80% of median income. Council members asked staff to bring back the agreement terms (including the negotiated workforce percentage for the complexes discussed) and a briefing on recent state changes that affect HFC transactions.
Council members also clarified process and timing: several council members said the items would be tabled and could be revisited after the requested briefing, with the original speaker noting the board-appointment forms and related materials would be reissued and reviewed in the next meeting cycle.
The meeting then moved to a closed (executive) session under Texas Government Code sections listed on the posted agenda.
Votes at a glance: No formal roll-call votes were recorded in the transcript excerpt. Council members agreed to table items by consensus and to request staff briefings; no tally or formal motion/second record was provided in the excerpt.
