Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public comment at OHA meeting raises questions about budget process, staff pay and meeting procedure

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A public commenter accused the Office of Hawaiian Affairs Board of Trustees of procedural violations and pay disparities in the biennium budget process; the board chair disputed several factual claims and said salary-setting and approvals followed human-resources and executive review.

Jermaine Myers, who identified himself as responsible for OHA's financial matters, used the public-comment period at the Board of Trustees meeting to challenge the biennium budget process and to highlight what he described as a pay disparity in senior staff salaries.

Myers asked, "Was the biennium budget process a collaboration or a collusion?" and defined “collaboration” as "work done transparently for the benefit of all the Lahui" and “collusion” as "work done in secrecy for the benefit of a few with self serving intentions," urging trustees to explain the process and the basis for leadership salaries.

Myers said the board’s chief of staff "was awarded a salary of $170,000" and that amount made the chief of staff the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans