Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission moves toward final Coffin Butte hearing as comp plan review and housing tasks progress
Summary
Community development staff said the Coffin Butte land-use hearings are reaching final phases after extensive public comment and that the county’s periodic comprehensive plan review was approved by the state agency; staff also discussed the housing subcommittee and potential next steps for regional housing support.
Community development staff told commissioners that the Coffin Butte landfill expansion review is entering its final planning commission hearings after a lengthy public record and that the county’s periodic comprehensive plan review process has advanced with state approval of the review scope.
Staff said the planning commission held a continued hearing and will conduct a final hearing; the record will remain open for written comment for a sequence of three seven‑day windows (public comment, applicant rebuttal and final staff response) leading to a decision before the end of the statutory review window. Staff noted nearly 2,000 individuals had signaled interest and that the record includes roughly 7,000 pages of comment and multiple supplemental exhibits from the applicant.
On the comprehensive plan and development code, staff reported the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) approved the county’s periodic review scope; community development staff plan to submit the formal application for funding and begin a 2‑year process if funded. Staff said one approach will be an iterative parallel process: address “low‑hanging fruit” or narrow legislative amendments (for example agri‑tourism or winery policy) on a faster track while conducting larger policy and public outreach work over the full review period.
Commissioners and staff also discussed the regional housing subcommittee that originated under the planning commission. Commissioners said they want a clearer scope and potential staff support and suggested reconvening a joint discussion with the planning commission to define whether the subcommittee will continue and, if so, how it should be scoped and resourced.
No Board action was taken; staff emphasized the priority to keep the Coffin Butte timeline and to prepare for potential appeals or de novo hearings if the planning commission decision is appealed to the Board of Commissioners or to LUBA.
