Conservation commission allows limited tree removal at two lakefront properties with conditions

The Town of Lakeville Conservation Commission on July 8 issued Negative Three determinations of applicability permitting limited tree removal at two shoreline properties — 17 Pine Bluff and 129 State Shore Road — subject to conditions intended to protect the adjacent pond.

Both matters were considered as requests for determinations under the Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, § 40. Conservation Agent Mark Menton told the commission he inspected both sites and that each involved removal of fallen or diseased trees and brush close to the water’s edge.

At 17 Pine Bluff, Agent Menton said the homeowner, Norma Anthony, reported that a relative had cut a few small trees and was attempting to clean debris on a steep slope near the water. Menton said Anthony had called the commission and proposed hiring an arborist to remove debris and cut stumps. The commission’s motion approving a Negative Three determination included conditions: no stump removal, no use of heavy equipment in or adjacent to the pond, and removal of any debris that falls into the water. The motion passed on an aye vote.

At 129 State Shore Road, the applicant (identified in the record as Donna) requested removal of a diseased elm tree whose roots were approaching a stone retaining wall and foundation near the water. Menton said the homeowner plans to have an arborist climb the tree and take it down in sections rather than bringing heavy equipment and that the homeowner preferred not to block the road with a crane. The commission approved a Negative Three determination with the same conditions: no stump removal, no heavy equipment in or adjacent to the pond, and removal of any debris that falls into the water. The motion passed on an aye vote.

In both matters commissioners noted timing and method: clambering removal by an arborist was preferred to grinding or pulling stumps because digging into the shoreline or removing stumps could mobilize material into the drinking-water supply. Menton recommended the commission require the stumps remain in place and limit mechanized work near the pond.

The commission recorded the determinations and the specified conditions; applicants were told to follow the conditions and coordinate any necessary follow-up with the conservation agent.

Short-term follow-up will be administrative: the applicants or their contractors must comply with the conditions imposed by the commission before any further disturbance occurs.