Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Toledo City Council approves revised collective bargaining agreement with ASME Local 2058
Summary
After an executive session on negotiations and pending litigation, the Toledo City Council passed an emergency ordinance approving a successor collective bargaining agreement with ASME Local 2058 and suspended rules to allow immediate enactment. The public record provided no details of the agreement's terms or financial impacts.
The Toledo City Council voted to approve an ordinance revising the city's collective bargaining agreement with ASME Local 2058, declaring an emergency and suspending rules to allow immediate passage.
The action followed an executive session in which council members said they would discuss "negotiations or bargaining sessions with public employees concerning their compensation or other terms and conditions of their employment" and "pending litigation." Council members returned from executive session and moved immediately to consider the ordinance.
Clerk read the ordinance as approving a revision of the current collective bargaining agreement between the City of Toledo and "ASME Local 2058" for a successor agreement consistent with the bargained understandings and declaring an emergency. The roll call recorded nine affirmative votes: McPherson, Serrantu, Williams, Driscoll, Hartman, Hobbs, Jones, Comives and Martinez. No nay votes or abstentions were recorded in the public minutes. The motion was announced as carried.
The transcript and the public reading of the ordinance did not specify the contract's monetary terms, effective dates, or detailed provisions, nor did it record a mover or seconder for the ordinance motion. Those details were not included in the portion of the record provided and were not read aloud at the meeting.
The council adjourned the special meeting after the ordinance passage.
(Details recorded in the public record: executive session reason stated as negotiations/bargaining with public employees and pending litigation; ordinance read and adopted with emergency declaration; vote recorded as nine "yes" votes.)
